Re: [Freevo-devel] avoid 'print' in code to be released

2009-05-25 Thread A Mennucc
the encoding server is outputting some text as follows self.currentjob.status: 0 self.currentjob.thread.returncode: ... self.currentjob.idnr: -- Andrea Mennucc "The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell me what I can't do, and the GPL sounds like it was w

Re: [Freevo-devel] avoid 'print' in code to be released

2009-05-25 Thread Duncan Webb
A Mennucc wrote: > hi, > > someone just mentioned 'print' statements used for debugging: > those should be avoided as much as possible in final releases. > > Some time ago, I did restart one of the freevo servers using > a ssh terminal. After some time I noticed that it had crashed. > The reason

Re: [Freevo-devel] [Freevo-users] iui based iphone/ipod interface for freevo WAS: Re: Whole house audio and iphone/ipod touch interface for freevo - initial stages started

2009-05-25 Thread Antispam @ vanderStad.nl
Op 23 mei 2009 om 12:25 heeft John Molohan het volgende geschreven:\ > Frank [Antispam account] wrote: >> >> >> >>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- >>> Van: John Molohan [mailto:john.molo...@gcd.ie] >>> Verzonden: 23 May 2009 01:14 >>> Aan: freevo-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; >>> freevo-dev

[Freevo-devel] avoid 'print' in code to be released

2009-05-25 Thread A Mennucc
hi, someone just mentioned 'print' statements used for debugging: those should be avoided as much as possible in final releases. Some time ago, I did restart one of the freevo servers using a ssh terminal. After some time I noticed that it had crashed. The reason is that, once the ssh connection

Re: [Freevo-devel] REL-1_8_4: audio.coversearch traceback

2009-05-25 Thread Duncan Webb
Matthias Reichl wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 06:07:57PM +0200, Duncan Webb wrote: >> Matthias Reichl wrote: >>> Thanks, your patch works fine. Coversearch is working again. >>> >>> Are there any other things I should test? >> >> Great, what ever you can think of, >> >> - the last.fm audio plug-

Re: [Freevo-devel] kaa.Process2 -> kaa.Process

2009-05-25 Thread Duncan Webb
On 25/05/2009 14:30, Jason Tackaberry said the following: > Any objections if I remove the old popen.py module and replace > kaa.Process with what is currently kaa.Process2? > > The API is different, but we all expected that. But it's more or less > feature complete and I believe I've worked out

[Freevo-devel] kaa.Process2 -> kaa.Process

2009-05-25 Thread Jason Tackaberry
Any objections if I remove the old popen.py module and replace kaa.Process with what is currently kaa.Process2? The API is different, but we all expected that. But it's more or less feature complete and I believe I've worked out all the bugs. I'd like to get it in before the release. Duncan, I