Re: [Freevo-devel] Mplayer demux

2007-05-19 Thread Benjamin Zores
Duncan Webb a écrit : > Justin Wetherell wrote: >> I can't seem to play mp3 streams I capture from online streams on FM >> radio stations. It comes down to the demuxer added onto the mplayer >> command line. I'm not really sure what the demuxer does and why it >> doesn't let me player captured stre

Re: [Freevo-devel] Question about SoC

2007-03-25 Thread Benjamin Zores
Lau Ming Leong a écrit : > I would like work on the Rework of LiveCD boot and HDD installation > process. Is it two separate project or one project for both part? Is it > doing the same things with the GeeXbox 2.x project? Thank you. Same project. The code is shared between v1.x and v2.x. Only t

Re: [Freevo-devel] Trying to be a member of SOC07

2007-03-23 Thread Benjamin Zores
And hurry up, deadline is today. Ben On 3/23/07, FoX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/3/23, NoNaMeNo TRiCKeD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi!, Thanks for your answer. I would like to work specially on "Rework of > > LiveCD boot and HDD installation process" .Also I would like to work on the > > "Inc

Re: [Freevo-devel] [Freevo-cvslog] Kaa r2543 - trunk/epg/src/sources

2007-03-18 Thread Benjamin Zores
Dirk Meyer a écrit : > Author: dmeyer > Date: Sun Mar 11 16:34:47 2007 > New Revision: 2543 > > Modified: >trunk/epg/src/sources/epgdata.py > > Log: > Rework parser to use SAX to keep memory usage down and call the > add_* functions from the thread. I don't have speed tests here but > I guess

Re: [Freevo-devel] libxml2 sucks

2007-02-27 Thread Benjamin Zores
Dirk Meyer a écrit : > Jason Tackaberry wrote: >> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:30 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: >>> 1. Use minidom for the cxml stuff. It may be slower, but we don't want >>>an extra dependency jsut to be able to install a module. >> What about expat? It should be much faster than minid

Re: [Freevo-devel] libxml2 sucks (was: kaa.epg design questions)

2007-02-26 Thread Benjamin Zores
> 4. pyxml seems to be faster than before. I need to make a speed >comparison. Even if it is a little bit slower we should use >it. Last time it was way slower, that's why we used libxml2. That would be good from GeeXboX point of view (one big dependency less) but from what i could remembe

Re: [Freevo-devel] [Freevo-cvslog] Kaa r2341 - trunk/popcorn/src/backends/mplayer

2007-01-04 Thread Benjamin Zores
On 1/4/07, Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: dmeyer > Date: Thu Jan 4 14:01:23 2007 > New Revision: 2341 > > Modified: >trunk/popcorn/src/backends/mplayer/player.py > > Log: > try to make the mplayer filter chain correct > +args = [ "-v", "-slave", "-osdlevel", "0", "-no

Re: [Freevo-devel] [Freevo-users] Browse Freevo Subversion Repository

2006-11-29 Thread Benjamin Zores
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:01:41 -0400 Rob Shortt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > naudefj wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > > Some sourceforge projects allow users to browse through the code with a Web > > Browser. Here is an example: > > > > http://interix-wgcc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/interix-wgcc/

Re: [Freevo-devel] New (and fixes) vf_overlay and vf_outbuf mplayer patch

2006-11-29 Thread Benjamin Zores
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:42:05 -0500 Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 19:25 +0100, Benjamin Zores wrote: > > Send it to MPlayer-devel too. > > I guess I could. I know it won't get included though -- the devs won't > like how

Re: [Freevo-devel] New (and fixes) vf_overlay and vf_outbuf mplayer patch

2006-11-29 Thread Benjamin Zores
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:06:39 -0500 Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Early this year I noticed a problem with vf_overlay where updates to the > overlay that occurred in between frames would cause stuttering in the > video. I wasn't sure what the problem was, so I disabled the frame >

Re: [Freevo-devel] Integration of Freevo in GeeXboX distro and Freevo2 perspective.

2006-11-29 Thread Benjamin Zores
> This sounds like great news. Mind if I put up a note on www.freevo.org > about the partnership? No problem about that. But this will officialize the partnership. I plan to do the same for GeeXboX next release (v1.1). For info, the Freevo port will be based on Freevo 2.x and has already started.

Re: [Freevo-devel] Using new DVDNAV capabilities of mplayer

2006-11-19 Thread Benjamin Zores
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:45:55 -0500 Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 22:34 +0100, Benjamin Zores wrote: > > Don't worry about that, there's no overlay for DVDs at the moment :-) > > SPU isn't handle at all. > > Hmm, ni

Re: [Freevo-devel] Using new DVDNAV capabilities of mplayer

2006-11-19 Thread Benjamin Zores
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:32:45 -0500 Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 20:27 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - And what about Freevo 2.0 ? > > Probably. It depends where the DVD overlays are being rendered. If it > happens after the filter chain we're going

Re: [Freevo-devel] Using new DVDNAV capabilities of mplayer

2006-11-19 Thread Benjamin Zores
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:25:43 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, > Since pre08, Mplayer is able to call the libdvdnav functions. Since rc1 only and barely. > It means > that mplayer is now able to read and process properly the various menus > available in DVDs (ie no more need to use XINE)

[Freevo-devel] Skin for future Freevo in GeeXboX inclusion

2006-11-19 Thread Benjamin Zores
Hi there, I made a first draft of future GeeXboX skin once Freevo2 will get in. Being mostly binary files, guess a regular patch isn't the best so I made an archive. You can grab it from there: http://geexbox.org/~ben/v2/patch-freevo-theme-geexbox.tar.bz2 (to avoid spaming everyone's mail with 3

Re: [Freevo-devel] Integration of Freevo in GeeXboX distro and Freevo2 perspective.

2006-11-15 Thread Benjamin Zores
> I can't speak for the others but to me that sounds wonderful. I have > been longing to build a Freevo live CD myself but find myself with a > lack of free time. I have been following morphix for a bit now but I > think I will switch my attention to geexbox! I have seen your project > before a

Re: [Freevo-devel] Integration of Freevo in GeeXboX distro and Freevo2 perspective.

2006-11-15 Thread Benjamin Zores
> Hmm. Well, given that, what are your future goals of the GeeXboX > project, and where do they intersect and diverge from Freevo? Let user decide. GeeXboX toolchain is modular and allows compiling the system with many features on or off. I'd like low-end system users to keep using old GeeXboX 1.

Re: [Freevo-devel] Integration of Freevo in GeeXboX distro and Freevo2 perspective.

2006-11-15 Thread Benjamin Zores
> That's great. I also know GeeXboX for some time and looked at > screenshots and the feature list for time to time. But I never tried > it. All projects know about each other while barely having a try at others. This is quite similar everywhere ;-) > That sounds great. Two good things can come

[Freevo-devel] Integration of Freevo in GeeXboX distro and Freevo2 perspective.

2006-11-14 Thread Benjamin Zores
Hi, Although knowing Freevo for quite a while, I've just subscribed to this list a few days ago. Let me introduce ... I'm MPlayer developer and team leader from GeeXboX distribution. After having reached our 1.0 goal, we're now facing towards a complete rework of our GUI and after several month