"Frank [Antispam account]" wrote:
> Wasn't that a part of Google Summer?
Yes, but the project failed because the student had not enough time.
Dischi
--
A day without sun shine is like, you know, night.
pgp0geTZoN59s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jody Gugelhupf wrote:
> if i'm not mistaken freevo 2.0 will include this feature that u can
> set up through the webinterface, at least it was planned to include
> this...
Yes. Freevo 2.0 has a config file we can write. So unlike the 1.x
local_conf.py a webserver, a gtk gui or even Freevo itself c
Wasn't that a part of Google Summer?
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
> Jody Gugelhupf
> Verzonden: 13 September 2007 19:40
> Aan: freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Onderwerp: Re: [Freevo-devel]
if i'm not mistaken freevo 2.0 will include this feature that u can set up
through the
webinterface, at least it was planned to include this...
jody :)
--- Justin Wetherell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always thought that having a web-base set-up would be the easiest of all.
> Basically, all
I always thought that having a web-base set-up would be the easiest of all.
Basically, all we would have to do is make sure that Twisted server can be
run without any modifications to local_conf and then all further changes
could be made via the web interface.
On 9/13/07, John Molohan <[EMAIL PROT
Hi all,
I think that it can be agreed that the biggest issue that puts users off
freevo is editing local_conf.py. At the moment freevo is too laborious
to setup. How hard would it be to modify 'freevo setup' to ask the user
a series of questions about their setup and write these back to
local_
