On Fri, 28 May 2004, Aubin Paul wrote:
> I think I already committed that new version of eyeD3... I didn't even
> notice the 2.3 requirement... I think that 2.3 is a reasonable
> requirement at this point, but that's because most distros have it
> now.
>
Yeah, and it'll reduce the number of dis
There are a lot of hacks in place for Pre-2.3; Boolean values, etc.
are not in prior releases, so we'd probably be able to cut down on a
lot of extra hacks if we standardized.
Aubin
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:43:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think it is a reasonable thing. Most distros
Dirk Meyer wrote:
So should Freevo require Python >= 2.3, too? Our unicode stuff may not
be working correct with older versions and 2.3 is out lonf enough.
Comments?
Fine for FreBSD.
(I still have hopes that the port will be committed at some point. It's
been ready for a long time now...)
Lars
I think it is a reasonable thing. Most distros have it and it makes the strptime hack
we currently have unneccessary. So it should clean up some of the scheduling problems
we have in the webserver and record server.
--
Michael Ruelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I just saw a new improved versi
I think I already committed that new version of eyeD3... I didn't even
notice the 2.3 requirement... I think that 2.3 is a reasonable
requirement at this point, but that's because most distros have it
now.
Aubin
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 12:28:34PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw a
Hi,
I just saw a new improved version of eyeD3 and integrated it into
mmpython (not in cvs right now). It also requires some changes in
mmpython, using unicode internal now (works good, also not in cvs).
A problem is that the new version of eyeD3 requires Python >= 2.3. I
don't know if it is bec
