[Freevo-devel] Re: Nasty problem with change in 'kills'

2003-10-24 Thread Aubin Paul
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Aubin Paul wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:00:56PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > >> > The change Dischi made today (change the kill -KILL to plain kill) > >> > seems to have a weird side effect. It does kill the display, but > >> > th

[Freevo-devel] Re: Nasty problem with change in 'kills'

2003-10-24 Thread Dirk Meyer
Aubin Paul wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:00:56PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: >> > The change Dischi made today (change the kill -KILL to plain kill) >> > seems to have a weird side effect. It does kill the display, but >> > the children (Freevo's typically runs as five seperate copies due to >>

[Freevo-devel] Re: Nasty problem with change in 'kills'

2003-10-24 Thread Dirk Meyer
Lars Eggert wrote: > Aubin Paul wrote: > >> Ok, this is confusing. The change Dischi made today (change the kill >> -KILL to plain kill) >> seems to have a weird side effect. It does kill the display, but >> the children (Freevo's typically runs as five seperate copies due to >> threading or someth

[Freevo-devel] Re: Nasty problem with change in 'kills'

2003-10-23 Thread Aubin Paul
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:00:56PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > > The change Dischi made today (change the kill -KILL to plain kill) > > seems to have a weird side effect. It does kill the display, but > > the children (Freevo's typically runs as five seperate copies due to > > threading or something

[Freevo-devel] Re: Nasty problem with change in 'kills'

2003-10-23 Thread Dirk Meyer
Aubin Paul wrote: > Ok, this is confusing. > > The change Dischi made today (change the kill -KILL to plain kill) > seems to have a weird side effect. It does kill the display, but > the children (Freevo's typically runs as five seperate copies due to > threading or something) don't die and now I'