And here's two video tutorials for PyDev - using python/jython in Eclipse.
http://showmedo.com/videos/series?name=PyDevEclipseList
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen Densmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:54 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
Saw this today on delicious:
http://tinyurl.com/y97dyh
Its a ramble through Eclipse with audio augmented slides.
So if your like most of us, and finding Eclipse a steep learning
curve, this is not at all bad. Dead simple, and leads you by the
hand nicely though getting started.
-- Ow
http://www.skytruth.org/
cheers Paul
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
To continue with material pertaining to a discussion at one end of the St. John's Student Union table this morning, see:The North Carolina Project --
http://anthropology.unc.edu/grad/research#ncproj
In 1996, Dorothy Holland, Donald Nonini, and Catherine Lutz received a
Na
Yes, it is nearly empty ;-) but you must admit that some
of the articles which do exist seem to be interesting.
Did you notice the huge diversity of placeholder sentences ?
This article will be written in..
To be written by the end of..
To be written shortly by..
To be written in..
To be compl
Scholarpedia seems like a good idea but IMHO is let down by it's complete lack of content. I clicked on a dozen links in the three encyclopedias they are hosting (the encyclopedia of dynamical systems sounded fun) and all I got was canned messages saying "This article has been reserved by Prof. Suc
Microsoft's new "We Share Your Pain (WSYP)" Program
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-c0YSsF_O0
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http:/
More important than the author's name and academic stature, is that the
essential element of a scholarally posting is references and citations to
support the posting so that a reader if so desired can judge for herself the
verification and validation of the information provided.
Perhaps a posti
for whatever my opinion is worth, 'sounds' great, but what about 'the
ruts' that scholarly thinking is so very famous for? The more
democratic media, like Wikipedia, aren't even that successful in
eliminating those diversions seems to me. Wouldn't 'Scholarpedia' just
move us backwards in exposi
Urgs, at least two slips of the pen in one post. Sorry.
Larry Sanger's new CITIZENDIUM (a compendium of knowledge
similar to Wikipedia - short for "the citizen's compendium")
at http://citizendium.org/ seems to go in a similar
direction. A Slashdot discussion can be found here
http://slashdot.o
Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org is similar
to Wikipedia. The difference is that each article
is written by an expert (invited or elected),
each article is anonymously peer reviewed, and
each article has a curator or editor. We had
similar ideas for our own DCS-Wiki at
http://www.vs.uni-k
11 matches
Mail list logo
