To the FRIAM gang, snowbound and otherwise
For those of us interested in data visualization, I just chanced upon this
fine site.
Check out: http://eagereyes.org/
-tj
--
==
J. T. Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
www.analyti
Hi,
I ran across this paper today, and while on the face of it it might seem
perverse, what it achieves may be relevant.
With these approaches, functional programming is possible and concise
using XSLT, and as MathML is a XML dialect, there's the possibility of
doing search and presentation (an
All,
Here are a few pictures of the Los Alamos Hill Stompers (one of the bands I
play with) New Year's party gig last night. The peacock pictures came about
from rescuing a hen who is stranded on our property because the snow is too
deep for her to walk all the way back across the field to her h
Owen Densmore wrote:
> So figuring out a good way to manage using different languages
> together, synergistically, is pretty important.
>
A datapoint: Swarm interfaces are declared using an extended version of
Objective C protocols. These interfaces are parsed into Lisp data
structures an
> I'd like to see simple naive Bayesian classifiers in Ruby ..
One issue Redfish deals with quite a bit is use of different
languages within projects. We'd like Python to talk to Processing
(Java) and Processing to talk to Blender.
JDK 1.6 took a tiny step: defining a way for Java to talk t
Owen Densmore wrote:
> But the bigger picture of my wish is precisely that: we need to build
> a far broader set of easily integrated tools for ABM. Far more
> important is the synergy amongst them than their ease of use.
>
My experience with Swarm was that it was not easy to do in an
incr
> 1 - If you/we were to start an open source project, what would it be?
> 2 - What open source project would you like to see happen?
I'd like to see simple naive Bayesian classifiers in Ruby for blocking
blog spam. I was going to do something like this but got distracted.
Rails is only getting big
The NYT have done a fairly impressive web2.0 visualization of the US
casualties in Iraq.
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/us/20061228_3000FACES_TAB1.html
Grim but real. My only concern is that the rectangular layout may
hide somewhat just how many have died. Possibly an additional list
would
> It's all fine and good to try to lower the cost of entry to ABM,
> but to
> get science done ABMers need a way to say something precise and
> have it
> understood by theorists. Pretty visual programming systems, GIS,
> etc.
> don't necessarily accomplish that.
I totally agree, and indeed
