Re: [FRIAM] What is mathematics? Really?

2008-07-27 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Sorry, as usual, I buggered my question: "Does anybody know who it was or from what point of view they were speaking when they referred to mathematics as "neutral" between idealism and realism" n Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROT

[FRIAM] Hossenfelder - Woit conversation

2008-07-27 Thread Carl Tollander
Nice tv conversation between Sabine Hossenfelder (backreaction.blogspot.com) and Peter Woit (Not Even Wrong -- www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress) on physics and institute funding. Not actually about string theory, but really seems to be about how fields develop and get funded, maybe lesson

[FRIAM] The Brain and Creativity

2008-07-27 Thread Orlando Leibovitz
The July 28 2008 issue of the New Yorker contains an article titled The Eureka Hunt: Why Do Good Ideas Come To Us When They Do. See http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/28/080728fa_fact_lehrer for an abstract. Although the article talks about human insight I think it touches on human c

Re: [FRIAM] no coincidence...

2008-07-27 Thread Phil Henshaw
Ken, Right. I'm quite comfortable discussing it from the observed physical phenomena. If you watch individual physical events develop what I think you quickly discover are developmental processes that statistical models can't duplicate. Nature does not actually work by 'cause and effect' until

Re: [FRIAM] The society of mind

2008-07-27 Thread Prof David West
The very first paper I published - too many years ago - in AI Magazine, then the flagship of the AI publication world - was a two part article, first part critiquing the prevailing computational falsework (a framework erected around a bridge to support it while concrete is being poured), the seco

Re: [FRIAM] Causality

2008-07-27 Thread Günther Greindl
Carl, Jack, Carl Tollander wrote: > That said, I like theory anyhow, but in order to approach any of these > TOE's, I've found that it helps to seek some understanding of their > historical context (such as from the math and physics community blogs > we've referred to elsewhere). I found some

Re: [FRIAM] no coincidence...

2008-07-27 Thread Ken Lloyd
Phil, Tell a skier that to an avalanche is just a statistical concept, or Ising or Potts fields to a physicist. SOC is the way most electronics work, SCR's and thus TRIAC's, Josephson junctions, and lasers. Lasers are my favorite example - SOC of light. I'm not sure the above fall into "Hail Mar

Re: [FRIAM] no coincidence...

2008-07-27 Thread Phil Henshaw
You refer to "a period of self-organizing criticality" as if that were an observable thing, whereas it appears to me to be a statistical concept for a set of chaotic equations. Part of what that model leaves out is the conserved processes of development that complex systems display, and how they b

[FRIAM] The society of mind

2008-07-27 Thread Jochen Fromm
Can we describe the mind as a society of agents? Marvin Minsky has written a book about the topic, and Steven Pinker speculates about it in "How the Mind works". How would the basic emotions we pain/displeasure and joy/pleasure look like? How does self-consciousness fit into this picture? I have