Re: [FRIAM] Facebook: OK, now what!?

2009-11-23 Thread Robert J. Cordingley
And I'd also like to sail the sea in a sieve because it's cheap. FB, TW, BS, PBW, etc are froth on that sea. (But perhaps here is the big picture: Non Sequitur .) Just look at the deteriorati

Re: [FRIAM] Facebook: OK, now what!?

2009-11-23 Thread Owen Densmore
I agree that there does not appear *to us* to be a non-hosted solution. But *to them*, the participants, I believe there is a scenario that would work. You have to remember that the participants have not been able to identify a systems administrator willing to manage a hosted solution. T

Re: [FRIAM] Facebook: OK, now what!?

2009-11-23 Thread James Steiner
Posterous looks like a cool tool for wide-casting updates to multiple services, including tweets, blogs, pictures and videos... ~~James On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Owen Densmore wrote: > Thanks for the help, good examples. > > One question has popped up for me: You can link twitter to fac

Re: [FRIAM] Facebook: OK, now what!?

2009-11-23 Thread Robert Holmes
So does the content of this thread provide convincing evidence that the Dunbar number is not a constant but is in fact a monotonically decreasing function of age? -- Robert FRIAM Applied C

[FRIAM] Dunbar numbers and distributions

2009-11-23 Thread Steve Smith
I would propose that the Dunbar Number is a function of many things.  My wife, for instance, was oldest of 8 and is very adept at managing a much larger and more diverse social network than I am although I (youngest of 2) am nearly 10 years her junior... early boomer to my late boomer.   I su