On 01/07/2015 12:22 PM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
And so believers who avoid this trap must construct an origins story
which cannot be falsifiable. It must be fantasy.
(¬Falsifiable ↛ false)
(fantasy ≢ counterfactual)
--
⇔ glen
FRIA
>
> And the skeptical response:
> https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/can-science-prove-the-existence-of-god-b6fefdc52588
"Do you want or need your belief in a divine or supernatural origin to
the Universe to be based in something that could be scientifically
disproven?"
And so believers who
In light of the exuberant discussion started by about Athiesm.
http://science.slashdot.org/story/14/12/30/2231220/science-cannot-prove-the-existence-of-god
In case you don't like slashdot for valid reasons:
Pro Seraphim however those wonderfully alien Kick Effing Arse Mother Effers
are spelled:
h
