Thanks, page. If you send me your email I will write you directly do I don’t
gum up FRIAM any more than I already have.
Briefly, I can find my sites, and long into them, but I cannot use all the
commands when I get there. In particular, the “g” command doesn’t do
anything. So, for insta
That reminds me of the time we were asked to provide a security monitoring
system for a nuclear site in a remote part of Russia. The task was pretty
simple from a monitoring standpoint - a single-entrance bunker. The Russians
wanted it to report all the way back to Moscow, however, so we asked
I have to put in the search 'sites' and then my google sites will come up
in the results. Or you can keep scrolling in the 'more' and you will
eventually see 'sites' under Home & Office.
Paige
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Nick Thompson
wrote:
> Has anybody had this problem?: I am coming
Has anybody had this problem?: I am coming back to Google Sites after a
long hiatus and am not being offered the full menu of commands in the
"More" menu. I suspect that I may have an identity confusion with Google.
Is anybody using Google sites anymore? Has anybody else found a way to deal
wi
Mohammed -
Also good to hear your "voice" after a very long time... I hope
things are going "well enough" for you, I assume you are still in
Cairo amidst the constant ebb and flow around you there.
I like the way you phrase this. I'm sure I have l
Well said, Mohammed.
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Phone
(505) 670-9918
On Jan 12, 2015 7:52 AM, "Mohammed El-Beltagy"
wrote:
> There is a common thread running through this discussion it that to my
> mind seems quite problematic. It has to do with imposing a restriction on
> any given religion to
Mohammed El-Beltagy wrote:
> Such holistic grasp and resultant passion may often accelerate our
> understanding of the natural world in the left brain or analytic
> sense. This case is very clear in ancient Egypt where that religious
> passion gave rise to amazing advances in mathematics, geometry
There is a common thread running through this discussion it that to my mind
seems quite problematic. It has to do with imposing a restriction on any
given religion to be "in concordance" with science to be "valid" and not to
be regarded as some fantasy or myth. Here any religion is reified to its
p
