Hi,
The following seems like it is simple thing to address, but it doesn’t seem
common. Here are my assumptions:
1) I have several computers configured in complicated ways that I’d like to
keep under my physical control.
2) I have an ordinary residential type of internet connection with one p
Alluvium. Thus, Alluvia.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Gary Schiltz
wrote:
> Arriving late to the party... how about “branch point” or “branch node”?
> Maybe “fork off point” ;-)
>
>
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> M
Arriving late to the party... how about “branch point” or “branch node”?
Maybe “fork off point” ;-)
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/lis
Sorry for being vague. By "matrixification", I made an attempt to suggest
something like taking a single 1-dimensional thing (a tube) and splitting it
into more than one thing, each of which is still 1-dimensional, but together
approaching a higher dimension (2 or 3).
By "articulation", I inte
Glen -
>> Reticulation is much more powerful, I think. But, yes, it seems to target
>> the leaves or the most-fractalized part of the network. But that brings to
>> mind: "matriculation" (from matrix) and "articulation", for whatever reason.
>>
Matriculation does indeed seem to be related to
Glen -
> Well, I did mention "plexus" in the very first post. So, perhaps all the
> word needs is a champion!
That would explain why we didn't mention it! Out of deference to the OP
(you, who also became the champion)? Doh! When prompted here I
*vaguely* remember dismissing it as too pop-sou
Well, I did mention "plexus" in the very first post. So, perhaps all the word
needs is a champion!
Anastomosis seems to be more like a shunt around the type of networked
structure we're talking about. Or, at least, the etymology seems to talk about
connecting two whole openings "make a hole"!
Thanks for this twist Eric...
We all know "you can verbize any noun"...
it is interesting to see that to "nounize an adjective, but you must do
it by way of a transitive verb"
I think that in the sense of linguistic and mathematical transitivity,
maybe one of the features found in the structures
In most computational modeling of phylogeny, there are not directional
transformations (as the name "filtration" suggests), but reversible
transformations of DNA in a genome (e.g. transitions/tranversions of
purines/pyrimidines).
On 8/21/18, 12:34 PM, "Friam on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣" wrote:
∄ uǝʃƃ -
I can't believe none of us offered up "plexus" along the way!
I think your invocation of "bed" *IS* maybe better served by "plenum"
and I can see how the portmanteau of plenum and nexus naturally arrive
at "plexus" as suggested. Plenum seems to connote "mixing" not just
collection/di
Very interesting.
In a rather different context, I was led to a word “apportionment”, which I
think is similar in intent to your fractionation.
The context was the inherent limitation of fitness as the term is used in
population genetics, where it is required (by the roles it must play in
Fi
Coalescence is a very nice sidetrack, actually. It, again, takes me back to
the notion of *a* filtration, in particular ascending and descending
filtrations. A brief hunt for a good antonym of "coalesce" lands me on
"fractionated". I like that better than the temporal implications (evoked in
Glen,
I haven’t followed this thread closely enough to have a good sense of what you
are after, so apologies if this is off point.
When you first asked, and hadn’t talked yet about specifically tree-like
networks, I was thinking that the converging end could borrow the term
“coalescent” from p
"Plenum" is a fantastic idea. I rejected "manifold" originally because I've
tried to use it in conversations with biologists before and it just didn't seem
to communicate the idea. It baffles me a bit because the word is so directly
available as "many folds". But perhaps it's too engineering-or
14 matches
Mail list logo
