FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
--
___
Ian P. Cook
m: 412.759.8973
jabber: ianpc...@gmail.com
Y!/MSN: ian_palmer_cook
AIM: ianpalmercook
:37 PM, glen e. p. ropella
g...@agent-based-modeling.com wrote:
Thus spake Ian P. Cook circa 26/01/09 08:50 AM:
If the interest is in the back-and-forth over the Hockey Stick, I don't
think you can go too wrong with the Wikipedia entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy
P. Cook
m: 412.759.8973
jabber: ianpc...@gmail.com
Y!/MSN: ian_palmer_cook
AIM: ianpalmercook
___
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures
that
even if a `theory of everything' governing all microscopic interactions were
discovered, the understanding of macroscopic order is likely to require
additional insights.
And commentary from NewScientist:
http://tiny.pl/srp2
-Ian
--
___
Ian P. Cook
m: 412.759.8973
David,
And BTW, I think the Pascal analogy is excellent, with due attention to
Marcus' caveat about measurability.
db
I guess I'd seen Marcus' point as demonstrating why Pascal's wager wasn't at
all applicable. As I understand it, the wager is entirely dependent on the
payoff to believing in
Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
--
___
Ian P. Cook
m: 703.405.0279
h: 703.578.0798
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y!/MSN: ian_palmer_cook
AIM: ianpalmercook