That was bad. Very bad. I'm envious.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> When you go back to work on Monday, guys, beware the IDEs of March.
>
> =
>
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St.
When you go back to work on Monday, guys, beware the IDEs of March.
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
I used Eclipse intensively and daily for quite a few years, starting around
2002 if I remember correctly, until 2008 (when I retired, or as I like to think
of it, took an extended personal sabbatical to Ecuador). There are a number of
reasons I really liked Eclipse, at least for Java development
Owen -
From one crusty old unix guy to another... I'm still splitting my
time between Vi/Make (technically Vim, but hardly use the advanced
features) and the IDE-of-the-moment. Xcode, Eclipse, Processing are
the most likely... and I find them all "very good".
My biggest gripe, if I mu
On Mar 13, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
Large IDEs like VisualStudio, Eclipse or NetBeans are
sometimes a bit slow. This is not surprising, since they
are often written in Java. But they offer powerful
functions for compiling and debugging, and they have
syntax highlighting, code comple
I'm another (C O G).
Emacs + gdb + gdb-mode == the best source-level debugging combo. TotalView
is ok, for a gui, pointy-clicky distributed debugging experience, but I
prefer emacs + gdb for serial debugging.
--Doug
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> With diversity, str
With diversity, strength.
I had an interesting conversation with Robert Holmes about his use of
Vi (I think he uses the newer Vim variant). He's incorporated it into
his work flow in a fairly complete way .. and this is its strength:
edit, compile, look at the file system, jump back and ha
. I can not debug a
program with Notepad, Emacs, VI or JEdit. Who
wants to use VI anyway?
-J.
- Original Message -
From: "Owen Densmore"
To: "The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group"
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Different t
It's directly proportional to how gawd awful languages and their
management become. Basically programming environments have gotten so
bad that You Need Help!
I will say, however, there's an interesting new breed of editors that
are halfway between "text editors" and IDEs. TextMate is absf
enhills.
>
> Ray Parks
>
> --
> *From*: friam-boun...@redfish.com
> *To*: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> Friam@redfish.com>
> *Sent*: Fri Mar 12 11:28:25 2010
> *Subject*: [FRIAM] Different topic
>
> Could someone please remind me again why s
Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: Fri Mar 12 11:28:25 2010
Subject: [FRIAM] Different topic
Could someone please remind me again why so many people seem to like Eclipse?
A colleague of mine at RTI took one of my distributed C++ applications and
turned it into an Appliance via VMWare (and/or
Could someone please remind me again why so many people seem to like
Eclipse? A colleague of mine at RTI took one of my distributed C++
applications and turned it into an Appliance via VMWare (and/or) VirtualBox.
All you have to do is run the appliance in a VM and you can emulate running
distribu
Damn, no respect from every quarter. Sadly, I'm used to that.
--DJR
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> I read this to my MythBuntu server, and it's only comment was: ow,
> butthead.
> -- rec --
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
>
>> Far, far rem
I read this to my MythBuntu server, and it's only comment was: ow, butthead.
-- rec --
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
> Far, far removed, thankfully, from the topic of 'should, or should not
> FRIAMers be encouraged to ramble enthusiastically about [pick your topic] in
>
Actually, I suspect that before any of that happens we will have a
discussion about how "bandwidth" is in an emergent property not fully
determined by any single piece of hardware (as the bottleneck analogy would
lead one to believe). Of course, I know less about that than many on the lists,
so I
Far, far removed, thankfully, from the topic of 'should, or should not
FRIAMers be encouraged to ramble enthusiastically about [pick your topic] in
the never ending goal of advancing science'. Topic du Jour, for those who
have lost count: emergence, and should we (or not) expect anything of
subst
16 matches
Mail list logo
