Sheesh, it just keeps getting better! I think Google is qualified to run
LANL.
http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/01/it-was-known-issue.html
--
*Doug Roberts
drobe...@rti.org
d...@parrot-farm.net*
*http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins*http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins
*
Beautiful!
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Joshua Thorp jth...@redfish.com wrote:
... I wonder if being incompetent violates Google's official corporate
policy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_be_evil?
Hah, good one. Made me laugh. Tough having people handle the job of a
python
Joshua Thorp
We would never say the python script was incompetent.
Would you say IBM Watson/Deep Blue is incompetent at Jeopardy/Chess
after it wipes the floor with the best human players in the world?
Marcus
FRIAM Applied
No you are right, I was mostly trying to take a dig at Google in the pile on.
But an automated boat wouldn't be completely 'empty' and its failure to
navigate would be grounds for anger (at those damned engineers). So my whole
line of thought turns out to be not that deep.
Guess I was the
On 1/14/13 1:16 PM, Joshua Thorp wrote:
But an automated boat wouldn't be completely 'empty' and its failure
to navigate would be grounds for anger (at those damned engineers).
On 60 minutes last night was (another) piece on robotics. One point
was that the U.S. could be competitive in
This country needs more automation, and less, er, breeding.
--Doug
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marcus G. Daniels mar...@snoutfarm.comwrote:
On 1/14/13 1:16 PM, Joshua Thorp wrote:
But an automated boat wouldn't be completely 'empty' and its failure to
navigate would be grounds for