y Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Subtle problem with BI
>
>
> The situation is just opposite :-) Now we develop simple,
> static (and well (without contradictions) and fully defined
> from the beginning) let's say Newtonian-type of s
From: "Jack Stafurik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Subtle problem with BI
> These are issues I (and many others) have grappled with for many years. I
> have strong opinions that deftly straddle both sides. So - I can
;s accuracy requirements.
Nuff said.
Jack Stafurik
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:23:20 -0500
> From: "Phil Henshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Subtle problem with BI
> To: "'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee G
xplorations: www.synapse9.com <http://www.synapse9.com/>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mikhail Gorelkin
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 5:06 PM
To: FRIAM
Subject: [FRIAM] Subtle problem with BI
Hello all,
It seems there is a
Hello all,
It seems there is a subtle problem with BI (data mining, data visualization,
etc.). Usually we assume that our data reflect adequately business issues
(customer behavior), and in the same time we update (patch) our data-collecting
software very often, which reflects the very fact
