On 6/27/07, Glen E. P. Ropella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
p.s. My argument above does not make the word "mathematician" useless by
ascribing it to _everyone_ (as Bristol did when implying that every
thing is emergent). It is only ascribed to those who attempt to form
rigorous conceptions o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Holmes wrote:
> You are correct, your definition of a mathematician does not include
> everyone; however it does include everyone you are likely to meet on
> the street. Those who do not "attempt to form rigorous conceptions of
> the things aro
www.synapse9.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen E. P. Ropella
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 5:13 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trapped in the house. Was:
