new-reasoning-ai-models-are-here-o1-preview-and-o1-mini/
[2]
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/05/heres-whats-really-going-on-inside-an-llms-neural-network/
From: Friam On Behalf Of steve smith
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2024 2:37 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] affinity for chatb
ng the
evidence for the axioms they adopt? That is, by adopting the
scientific methods. Can we expect LLMs to have “other ways of
knowing”? If not, why not?
*From:*Friam *On Behalf Of *Prof David West
*Sent:* Sunday, September 15, 2024 8:40 AM
*To:* friam@redfish.com
*Subject:* Re:
: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2024 8:40 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] affinity for chatbots
Roger,
I love this post. Although NOT what you intended, I find it a scathing (if a
bit indirect) indictment of scientism (the privileging of the
On 9/15/24 9:40 AM, Prof David West wrote:
Roger,
I love this post. Although NOT what you intended, I find it a scathing
(if a bit indirect) indictment of scientism (the privileging of the
scientific method) and of Pierce's truth as reasoned consensus philosophy
i can only hope to meet an u
regarding co-constructing and LLMs/ML/AI/Chatbots: I'm just now reading
through Harari's Nexus (brief history of information networks) and
still/re-enamored of his regular use of "intersubjective reality" as
what it is we co-create... and in particular all things we identify as
"culture" being
Roger,
I love this post. Although NOT what you intended, I find it a scathing (if a
bit indirect) indictment of scientism (the privileging of the scientific
method) and of Pierce's truth as reasoned consensus philosophy.
i can only hope to meet an unbiased LLM. Maybe as entertaining and enlight
The Agile versus Waterfall contrast sounds like a variation of Exploration
versus Exploitation. I'm glad nuclear decommissioning isn't running
Reinforcement Learning, that could lead to some very unfortunate
explorations.
It's odd to hear Residual Bias spoken of as something that should
eventuall
Both Roger's and Marcus' replies mentioned the co-construction of *the* world, at least
indirectly. Your concept of narrowing sounds to me like a refining, rather than a
narrowing. In order to refine, you do have to narrow the scope (or decrease the focal
length of your lens), but you're not na
high complexity might be
suggestive of something more.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2024 12:11 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] affinity for chatbots
The conversations described by glen as well as those previously posted
DaveW -
I am curious about what that game of "whack a mole" might have looked
like in those early days. I was a laggy enough adopter that I only
noticed a few times when a thread or subject that I'd been indulged in
by GPT (3.5) suddenly became Verboten.
Gemini is *much* more prone to resp
The conversations described by glen as well as those previously posted take
place with 'sanitized' versions of chatbots: i.e., those that have, to a
degree, removed racist/sexist bias, but also entire chunks of subject matter.
Seemingly within seconds of the first releases of chatAIs, users were
Glen -
I appreciate your speaking more directly to these thoughts/ideas than we
have been here. I have been moved by your assertions about vocal
(linguistic?) grooming since you first introduced them. I am recently
finished reading Sopolsky's "Primate's Memoir" which adds another
dimensio
s, is
that there is less ego involvement as it is a more intimate setting. If
those interventions are your thing. I'd prefer to leave it to the machines,
myself!
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 11:12 PM
To: FriAM
Subject: [FRIAM
Then there's
https://www.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/sep/09/the-big-idea-how-the-protege-effect-can-help-you-learn-almost-anything
which
is about the benefits of teaching anyone, but the author chose to teach a
chatbot. Irene countered with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debuggin
We've talked about how some of us really enjoy simulated conversation with chatbots ...
"really" is an understatement ... it looks more like a fetish or a kink to me ... too
intense to be well-described as "enjoyment". Anyway, this article lands in that space, I
think:
Durably reducing conspir
15 matches
Mail list logo
