Re: [FRIAM] credibility by association

2016-08-13 Thread Frank Wimberly
; Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology > > Clark University > > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ > > *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] > > *On Behalf Of *Roger Critchlow *Sent:* Friday, August 12, 2016 9:05 PM > *To:* The Friday M

Re: [FRIAM] credibility by association

2016-08-13 Thread Barry MacKichan
, 2016 9:05 PM *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group < Friam@redfish.com> *Subject:* [FRIAM] credibility by association From Science 12 Aug 2016:: A decade ago, it seemed as though every other neuroscience paper in high-profile journals featured multiple multicolored

Re: [FRIAM] credibility by association

2016-08-12 Thread Russ Abbott
half Of *Roger > Critchlow > *Sent:* Friday, August 12, 2016 9:05 PM > *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group < > Friam@redfish.com> > *Subject:* [FRIAM] credibility by association > > > > From Science 12 Aug 2016:: > > > > A decade ago, it

Re: [FRIAM] credibility by association

2016-08-12 Thread Nick Thompson
, August 12, 2016 9:05 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: [FRIAM] credibility by association >From Science 12 Aug 2016:: A decade ago, it seemed as though every other neuroscience paper in high-profile journals featured multiple multicolored images of br

[FRIAM] credibility by association

2016-08-12 Thread Roger Critchlow
>From Science 12 Aug 2016:: A decade ago, it seemed as though every other neuroscience paper in > high-profile journals featured multiple multicolored images of brain scans. > In some cases, readers—many of whom were psychologists who had written > papers on the same topic—pointed out that the pi