Re: [fricas-devel] Re: =rule(j*j==1) matches integer

2017-06-06 Thread Bill Page
On 5 June 2017 at 20:02, oldk1331 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Bill Page wrote: >> On 5 June 2017 at 05:58, oldk1331 wrote: >>> Also, it seems that current pattern-matcher is very different from >>> (weaker?) the Jenks&Sutor book, why is that? >>> >> Can you give an example? >> > > T

Re: [fricas-devel] Re: =rule(j*j==1) matches integer

2017-06-05 Thread oldk1331
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Bill Page wrote: > On 5 June 2017 at 05:58, oldk1331 wrote: >> Also, it seems that current pattern-matcher is very different from >> (weaker?) the Jenks&Sutor book, why is that? >> > > Can you give an example? > The usage of optional by '?' and multiple by ':', I

Re: [fricas-devel] Re: =rule(j*j==1) matches integer

2017-06-05 Thread Bill Page
On 5 June 2017 at 05:58, oldk1331 wrote: > Also, it seems that current pattern-matcher is very different from > (weaker?) the Jenks&Sutor book, why is that? > Can you give an example? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system

[fricas-devel] Re: =rule(j*j==1) matches integer

2017-06-05 Thread oldk1331
Also, it seems that current pattern-matcher is very different from (weaker?) the Jenks&Sutor book, why is that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,