Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> On 12/20/2016 11:00 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > The first example for 'split' (and probably the only one in FriCAS
> > book) is to split on spaces. In such case the expected behaviour
> > is to treat several consecutive spaces as a single separator.
>
> Yes, that's a g
On 12/20/2016 11:00 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> The first example for 'split' (and probably the only one in FriCAS
> book) is to split on spaces. In such case the expected behaviour
> is to treat several consecutive spaces as a single separator.
Yes, that's a good reason to keep the current imple
Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier wrote:
>
> discovered a strange behaviour of the split function for Strings:
>
> A very natural application is to read in a CSV file and get as many
> Strings - possibly empty ones - as the number of occurencies of the
> splitting character indicates (+1):
>
> Howeve
On 12/17/2016 01:56 PM, Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier privat wrote:
> A very natural application is to read in a CSV file and get as many
> Strings - possibly empty ones - as the number of occurencies of the
> splitting character indicates (+1):
I support that change.
> (1) -> line := "A;B;;C;;"
>
Hi,
discovered a strange behaviour of the split function for Strings:
A very natural application is to read in a CSV file and get as many
Strings - possibly empty ones - as the number of occurencies of the
splitting character indicates (+1):
However:
(1) -> line := "A;B;;C;;"
(1) "A;B;;C;;
