Hi Jim,
Besides the obvious, exactly why should Cisco or any other vendor in our
business be shielded from public scrutiny on products which are faulty? I
am sure that Merck would like to have kept Vioxx on the market, even
though people died from it. I am just as sure that Guidant Corp did not
###-XSS-#
Informed site admin: 4-15-05
http://about.nordstrom.com/help/livehelp/livehelpstart.asp?uri=http://maliciousSITE.com
Discovered by Jeff Peadro jeff.peadro [at] gmail.com
###-XSS-#
###-XSS-###
http://jg-tc.com/shared-content/search/index.php?search=goo=0l=XSS%22%20style=%22background:url(javascript:alert('XSS'))s=recentr=d1=yesterdayd2=todayq=
Wernfried Haas wrote:
assuming you actually meant
:(){ :|: };: (which can be harmful if no limits are set)?
It should be noted that according to the limits man page, By default no
quotas are imposed on 'root'. In fact, there is no way to impose limits via
this procedure to
Hi,
...
Info
Efilter is an automatic exception reporting utility. It is very useful
and handy while doing vulnerability research on any software designed
to work under Windows NT platforms. Due to that it hooks
KiUserExceptionDispatcher function, it acts BEFORE any of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20050812-27] Discuz! arbitrary script upload
vulnerability.
Revision 1.0
Date Published: 2005-8-12 (KST)
Last Update: 2005-8-12 (KST)
Disclosed by SSR Team ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Summary
Discuz! is one of famous
My personal logs for imap scan for last 3 days -
11/08/2005 10:47:29 IMAP: (Accept) Receiving from 218.47.179.77
11/08/2005 10:48:00 IMAP: (Accept) Receiving from 218.47.179.77
12/08/2005 10:31:06 IMAP: (Accept) Receiving from 220.224.38.222
12/08/2005 14:00:34 IMAP: (Accept) Receiving from
List of what I have for imapd vulns.
Look both at the Description and Code sections.
http://www.milw0rm.com/search.php?dong=imapd
/str0ke
On 8/14/05, Aditya Deshmukh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal logs for imap scan for last 3 days -
11/08/2005 10:47:29 IMAP: (Accept) Receiving from
Drupal security advisory DRUPAL-SA-2005-004
Advisory ID:DRUPAL-SA-2005-004
Date: 2005-aug-15
CVE
Agent: FANTASTIC!! What do you call youselves???
Pops: The Aristocrates!!!
View attached.
On 8/14/05, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think its pathetic the way everyone has handled the whole affair. I
don't blame Cisco for anything. To see these self proclaimed hackers
goto Blackhat
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200508-06
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - -
11 matches
Mail list logo