Can we get stats?
On 10/1/07, Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ditto
>
> On 10/1/07, Anshuman G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Me :) and I think lots of people are interested .
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anshu
> >
> > On 10/2/07, Thierry Zoller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Who is
WifiZoo v1.2:
-Bug Fixes
-It now has a web GUI running on localhost:8000, it will hopefully
make its use more 'convenient'
-And it also has an 'http proxy' ala ferret/hamster. You can display
the captured cookies with the web gui, clicking on a cookie will set
that cookie on the wifizoo proxy. Set
ditto
On 10/1/07, Anshuman G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Me :) and I think lots of people are interested .
>
> Regards,
> Anshu
>
> On 10/2/07, Thierry Zoller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Who is interested in the stats ?
> >
>
> ___
> Full-D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDKSA-2007:192
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
___
Me :) and I think lots of people are interested .
Regards,
Anshu
On 10/2/07, Thierry Zoller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Who is interested in the stats ?
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-
Dear Nick,
Thank you for your insight on this, I think it should be clear to anybody that
if you display just text it should be useless, the stats proof you
wrong though.
- Some poeple like clicking on links even if they are simply
displayed.
- Some mailing list mirrors do not remove the image
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDKSA-2007:191
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
___
On 9/29/07, Morning Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Outlook Express blocks this by default, unless you click
> the "show images" dialog thingie
Same with gmail
-JP
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclos
This release we include a flurry of new exciting features!
We are proud to announce the first beta version of our free
Vista Heap Library, which supports the new 'Freelist' and
Low Fragmentation Chunk. Check out the new usage of the
!heap command for more details.
Also included in this release
###
Luigi Auriemma
Application: FSD
http://www.mcdu.com/en/download.php
Versions: <= "V2.052 d9" (original FSD) and "V3.000 d9" (FSFDT FSD)
Platforms:Windows and *nix
Bugs:
###
Luigi Auriemma
Application: Doom 3 engine
Games:Doom 3 (http://www.doom3.com)<= 1.3.1
Quake 4(http://www.quake4game.com) <= 1.4.2
###
Luigi Auriemma
Application: F.E.A.R. (First Encounter Assault Recon)
http://www.whatisfear.com
Versions: <= 1.08
Platforms:Windows and Linux
Bug: format string
Exp
###
Luigi Auriemma
Application: America's Army and America's Army Special Forces
http://www.americasarmy.com
Versions: <= 2.8.2
Platforms:Windows, Linux and Mac
Bugs: u
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:33:20 EDT, wac said:
> >
> > If I use strcpy() to read user input into a buffer, I am at fault and
> > not C compiler.
>
>
> I don't think that's a fair comparison.
> If you make the right algorithm and you do not get the expected
> results *is* not
> your fault but what a
>
> If I use strcpy() to read user input into a buffer, I am at fault and
> not C compiler.
I don't think that's a fair comparison.
If you make the right algorithm and you do not get the expected
results *is* not
your fault but what are you sitting at (compiler, framework, library ...).
Hello:
On 9/29/07, Andrew Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
>
> If your bank is doing financial calculations using Javascript in a
> standard web browser, you have bigger things to worry about than
> roundoff errors.
Ok let's explain this with more details because I realize that you got
some
This paper aims to present a methodical framework for high-level reverse
engineering. The methodology is a culmination of existing tools and
techniques within the IT security research community, which presents
ways to identify process operation at a higher-level of abstraction than
traditional bina
On 10/1/07, Fareeduddin Ahmad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The CPU utilization of our Netscreen 5400 suddenly went up from 5% to 54% -
> upto 81%. Now its moving between 33% and 81%. What are all the reasons the
> firewall could be doing this ?
Policies related to ALG.
Brian
--
Bri
Hi guys,
The CPU utilization of our Netscreen 5400 suddenly went up from 5% to 54% -
upto 81%. Now its moving between 33% and 81%. What are all the reasons the
firewall could be doing this ?
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Fareed
___
Full-Disclosure - We bel
19 matches
Mail list logo