-- Forwarded message --
From: worried security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 21, 2007 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Chat with Dude VanWinkle
To: Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 20, 2007 4:43 AM, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These messages were sent while you were
On Dec 20, 2007 7:19 PM, SecReview <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these companies?
>
> We are a team of security professionals that have been performing a
> wide array of penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, web
> application security services
On Dec 21, 2007 11:05 AM, php0t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We're made up of: "online news
> > journalists, corporate security, government security, military
> > defense, intelligence service, law inforcement and freelance ethical
> > hackers.
>
> You are one of the most delusional people I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, because I disagree strongly with your actions I must be the
subject of your review?
Clearly, your progenitors were swimming in the shallow end of the
gene pool when they set about screwing your sorry excuse for a
brain into existence.
You obvious
> Yes we are an easy
> target for php0t etc right now, but in the future we will be the
> biggest on the internet in the long term.
I didn't know 'being targetted' means somebody replies to one of your mails
(OFF LIST!) to express an opinion. What is going to change about this in the
long term
I believe the BackTrack guys get some of it and put the rest back
into Offensive Security. See http://www.remote-
exploit.org/news.html, June 07.
Elazar
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:02:03 -0500 Matthew Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>gmaggro wrote:
>> ..it would be a nice touch if everyone sent a fe
PaulM:
You'd be right only if you weren't wrong. That being said, we're
not going to talk to the trolls any more. While it might be amusing
it's a waste of our time, and our readers time.
We will continue to write reviews and will continue to be as honest
and truthful as possible during our re
Unless I missed something, these seemed like legitimate responses. They may
not have all been delivered with tact, but I mean, you are on FD, what did
you expect?
I think some valid points are brought up about your credentials and your
process.
Nate
On 12/21/07, SecReview <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I believe your answers are definitely more trollish and kiddie-like
than the legitimate responses, despite the aggressive or tactless
comments, as Nate mentioned.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosur
I agree with Nate. It's odd how you dismiss any critics as 'trolls,' and
only believe that people who compliment your efforts are 'legitimate
readers.' As an author and public speaker I know that I get the most value
from people who critique my work because they help me to improve. Sure,
being slap
On Dec 21, 2007 1:11 PM, worried security
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007 11:05 AM, php0t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We're made up of: "online news
> > > journalists, corporate security, government security, military
> > > defense, intelligence service, law inforcement and freela
Absolute Poker recently had an incident over the summer where an insider had
access to a "super-user" account and was able to see the cards of every
player at the table. That whole incident played out like a B Movie. Lots of
details about the incident have been posted over various sites; here are a
###
Luigi Auriemma
Application: WinUAE
http://www.winuae.net
Versions: <= 1.4.4
Platforms:Windows
Bug: buffer-overflow
Exploitation: local
Date: 21 Dec 2007
Au
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Title: [CAID 35970]: CA Products That Embed Ingres Authentication
Vulnerability
CA Vuln ID (CAID): 35970
CA Advisory Date: 2007-12-19
Reported By: Ingres Corporation
Impact: Attacker can gain elevated privileges.
Summary: A potential vulnerabilit
Sorry for the brief post but Im still able to bypass filters that aol has
put in place. So again with frustration I come to FD to imply pressure on a
company to patch correct. From reading feedback from AOL they feel the
vulnerability is put to bed and requires no more attention.
I am not postin
All,
I read a paper last night titled "The Geometry of Innocent Flesh on the Bone"
(http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~hovav/). It described a technique similar to
return-into-libc. The utility I'm attaching (hikaru) implements an automated
binary analysis to determine possible instructions (gadgets, p
It would help if I attached the file wouldn't it?
- Ben
> All,
>
> I read a paper last night titled "The Geometry of Innocent Flesh on the Bone"
> (http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~hovav/).
> It described a technique similar to return-into-libc. The utility I'm
> attaching (hikaru) implements an au
On Dec 21, 2007 5:36 PM, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I read a paper last night titled "The Geometry of Innocent Flesh on the Bone"
> (http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~hovav/). It described a technique similar to
> return-into-libc.
yes, this is fun stuff :)
'''
Our thesis: In any suļ¬cien
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:11:22 GMT, worried security said:
> In 5 to 10 years n3td3v should be an elite force of people from
> corporate,government,military,intelligence,law and freelance ethical
> hackers that is way bigger than any other group on the internet.
The only problem is that the talent
19 matches
Mail list logo
