Title: Buffer overflow in Python zlib extension module
Date Discoverd: ??-April-2008
Date Reported: 08-April-2008
Date Patched: 08-April-2008
Date Disclosed: 09-April-2008
Criticality:Critical
Affected Products
-
Now that's immature.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O thanks for ur comment !! I'm sure u didn't get the point but u got
something in ur mouth that's wat u said.
Anyway my advise is u know !!!
http://annysoft.wordpress.com
On 4/9/08, [EMAIL
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:00:09 BST, n3td3v said:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Razi Shaban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, by replying to your enemies you're just proving them right.
If you just ignore them, you'll embaress them and make them look
foolish.
So you're admitting you're
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:58:34 BST, n3td3v said:
Keith has repost
http://blog.securitynow.us/2008/04/07/storm-worm-russian-business-network-rbn-repost-from-march-19-2008/
his original entry after finding out i'm not a troll.
If Keith read Neal's analysis as saying you were a troll, he totally
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200804-08
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - -
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:53:44 BST, n3td3v said:
It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
your employees, and you've got to patch your offline machines as fast
as your online ones.
Hate to burst your bubble, but insider threats have been understood as an
issue since
I was trying to get you to shut up. I thought you might have the
intelligence to realize I was doing that, but I never thought you were
dumb enough to take me seriously.
--
Razi
On 4/9/08, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Razi Shaban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:30:36 MDT, James Lay said:
So yesterday a network that I do work for had it's mail server scanned. I
reported the scan (snort reported nmap -F scan) to the offending netblock
owner, thinking that they had a compromised machine. I was surprised to
receive an email this
I rest my case, your honor, no more witnesses.
I repeat...STFU
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:23:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O thanks for ur comment !! I'm sure u didn't get the point but u
got
something in ur mouth that's wat u said.
Anyway my advise is u know !!!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:53:44 BST, n3td3v said:
It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
your employees, and you've got to patch your offline machines as fast
as your online ones.
Hate to burst your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200804-10
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200804-09
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-1545-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
April 10, 2008
I'm calling for a security conference mailing list to be setup, this
is getting beyond a joke now all this unlawful commercial spam.
If you want to make money, then go buy ads and page impressions on
websites the legitimate way. Please someone setup a security
conference and training mailing list
n3td3v... The list is unmoderated. That's why we have to get 63
emails for your last pointless rant. Some of us find these conference
emails quite useful.
Nate
On 4/10/08, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm calling for a security conference mailing list to be setup, this
is getting beyond a
To which I propose a No more n3td3v mailing list be setup ;-)
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Nate McFeters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
n3td3v... The list is unmoderated. That's why we have to get 63
emails for your last pointless rant. Some of us find these conference
emails quite useful.
What laws are they breaking? How hard is it for you to create a filter on
your mail account for the same message to be removed?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:16 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm calling for a security conference mailing list to be setup, this
is getting beyond a joke now
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM, DUDE DUDERINO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What laws are they breaking?
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't go into specifics. I'm sure someone on
the list will be able to point out that a major security conference
with major sponsors like Microsoft have the money to buy
Allow me to posit the following: netdev wants attention, even if its
negative attention. I.e., he is intentionally saying things that are
inflammatory/unintelligent/provocative so as to arouse a reaction.
To say that this is out of stupidity (or that netdev is unintelligent) is a
conclusion
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Nate McFeters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what's your agenda for spamming everyone n3td3v?
I'm not a spammer... I have never sent a message to make money...
Regards,
n3td3v
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
iDefense Security Advisory 04.09.08
http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/
Apr 09, 2008
I. BACKGROUND
EMC DiskXtender is a data backup and migration suite. It consists of
several applications that are used to manage storing large quantities
of files across multiple storage
Don't have to
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
-Original Message-
From: n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:21:38
To:full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] EUSecWest CFP Closes April 14th (conf May
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 17:55 -0400, Nate McFeters wrote:
n3td3v... The list is unmoderated. That's why we have to get 63
emails for your last pointless rant. Some of us find these conference
emails quite useful.
FYI, I maintain a calendar for security conference dates, CFP deadlines,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:26 AM, josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't have to
Are you going to EUSecWest, work for a sponsor or are some way losing
out by me calling for a new mailing list to be setup?
All the best,
n3td3v
___
Full-Disclosure - We
Don't hijack threads.
--
Razi
On 4/11/08, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm calling for a security conference mailing list to be setup, this
is getting beyond a joke now all this unlawful commercial spam.
If you want to make money, then go buy ads and page impressions on
websites the
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Razi Shaban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't hijack threads.
I'll hijack a thread thats making £1000 per person if I want.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
So you're admitting that you hijack threads?
--
Razi
On 4/11/08, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Razi Shaban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't hijack threads.
I'll hijack a thread thats making £1000 per person if I want.
hey netdev,
dude if you want a list for conferences, why dont you set one up? you
obviously know how, through google groups, as you have one...
then advertise to all the lists, that you made a list, then we'll worry
about it there.?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:26 PM, josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey netdev,
dude if you want a list for conferences, why dont you set one up? you
obviously know how, through google groups, as you have one...
then advertise to all the lists, that you made a list, then we'll worry
about it
i'm just saying, if you arent willing to do the work, then dont ask others
to do it for you.
if you want something done right, do it yourself.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey netdev,
This is Perl Underground here. We thought we could respond to a
couple
kids, cause there ain't nothin' like dissin' on FD. Part of this
rant
is just in general, and might end up in Perl Underground 6. So it's
to
be considered BETA, and thus criticism is UNACCEPTABLE!!!
Just kidding.
RSnake
You know n3td3v, conferences are a lot of fun to go to. I've sat by on FD
and watched you hijack numerous threads, blast out emails that lead to
ridiculous amounts of wated time and resources, and I've never once said
anything against you. Why? FD is and always has been an unmoderated list.
Hey Perl Underground,
Maybe I missed something, could you provide some context around your gripe
against RSnake? I'm struggling a bit with it, and your email is quite long
and heavily line broken, making it hard to read.
I've found RSnake to be pretty knowledgeable when it comes to web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-1546-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Devin Carraway
April 10, 2008
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Nate McFeters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so do the
vulnerability research companies like Tipping Point's ZDI and iDefense.
Would you contest that they shouldn't post here either?
I have no problems with big companies who spam who are disclosing a
vulnerability
you don't see Bruce posting 5 times a day here
n3td3v wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:53:44 BST, n3td3v said:
It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
your employees, and you've got to patch your
That's pretty funny.
I used to get a kick out of your BS but, I must say, you are getting
very monotonous with your over inflated self-worth.
You have admitted that all you do is scrape other sites and post their
knowledge to your agenda group.
Basically, you're saying you are a journalist
37 matches
Mail list logo
