Well,
this is not because you are not skilled for coding exploit that peoples who
do that are lame.
Big majority of posts here are useless, so I take advantage of it to post a
personnal message, that's all.
You are not interested ? OK. Good bye.
2008/7/29, Charles Majola [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you all for your comments. However, I cannot disagree more
fully.
It doesn't matter that the blacklist is not complete, if a scammer
tries to phish a bank that's not on the list, eg. is not popular, he
won't make much money, because it's a small bank and the probability
of him hitting
You have to be the major of dorkville.
While you ware writing that, I was playing soccer against a team from
another town
This reply is late becouse we went down to the lakehouse for a few days...
Yeah, I'm... a... dork...
Who is more retarted?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Professor
lsi wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. However, I cannot disagree more
fully.
Ignorance does that for people...
It doesn't matter that the blacklist is not complete, if a scammer
tries to phish a bank that's not on the list, eg. is not popular, he
won't make much money, because
Hi,
Lots of people have been asking for details about the slightly
unorthodox shellcode I used within the IOS FTP exploit, so here goes:
.equ vty_info, 0x8182da60 //contains a pointer to the VTY info structure
.equ terminate, 0x80e4086c
lis 4,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
la 4,[EMAIL
Hello
Please find attached advisories to be published.
Kind Regards
Advisories
Portcullis Computer Security Ltd
###
This email originates from the systems of Portcullis
Computer Security Limited, a Private limited company,
-- Forwarded message --
From: newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Subject: 'World's most dangerous hacker' to be extradited to US
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A British man who hacked into computers at the Pentagon will face
trial in the US after the law
-- Forwarded message --
From: n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:40 PM
Subject: Are Bug Disclosures Helping or Hurting?
To: n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM report shows that as soon as a vulnerability is disclosed, an
exploit is made for it. Some think it's time
In light of the new DNS cache poisoning issue and now that everyone has
had plenty of time to apply patches, I've decided to release a new version
of my nameserver security scanner called porkbind. It is a multi-threaded
nameserver scanner that can recursively query nameservers of subdomains
The sender would like to recall the message, [Full-disclosure] simple phishing
fix.
-
This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If you are not the
I think you are the new greatest troll of FD
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:14 AM, lsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. However, I cannot disagree more
fully.
It doesn't matter that the blacklist is not complete, if a scammer
tries to phish a bank that's not on the
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:07:03 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The need for something more like ssl certs in there remains
It's called DNSSEC, which has been out for a decade and more.
(Also needed for bgp I suspect).
RFC2385 (TCP MD5 protection for BGP) addresses most of the issues, at least
on a
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:14 AM, lsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. However, I cannot disagree more
fully.
The simple fact that you said, put all banks on the list except the
one you actually use, really demonstrates how poorly some of this has
been thought out.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sender would like to recall the message, [Full-disclosure] simple
phishing fix.
You mean this email? Seriously, people need to learn that the that
the recall feature in Exchange doesn't work. I don't read every email
in my inbox,
Anyone spot the typo? It's also in a comment in the exploit source,
but doesn't affect how the code works:
addi7,7,233 should read addi7,7,2330
The first offset (requirement to authenticate) is at 0x174 and the
second (privilege level) is at 0xde4
Its worth noting that at some stage
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 23:27:45 Nick FitzGerald wrote:
You really have no f*ing clue how ordinary users' tiny little brains
work, have you???
I got an inkling when a phishing spam asked me for the usual information, and
also requested my future password.
--
Hawaiian Astronomical Society:
No time to comment on most, but just to throw this in there:
Here in the states we have a few hundred thousand different banks at
least. 500 is WAY too small of a number. Credit Unions are banks, small
banks, and almost every city has at least one credit union. The city I grew
up in has
sweet 12 advisories in software no one uses
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:58 AM, advisories
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Please find attached advisories to be published.
Kind Regards
Advisories
Portcullis Computer Security Ltd
--
This email originates
On 30-Jul-08, at 9:19 AM, Exibar wrote:
No time to comment on most, but just to throw this in there:
Here in the states we have a few hundred thousand different banks
at
least. 500 is WAY too small of a number. Credit Unions are banks,
small
banks, and almost every city has at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2008:158
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
There are quite a few credit unions and smaller savings institutions that are
not FDIC insured.
Not to mention all the FDIC insured savings institutions that are worth less
than $100 million
Exibar
- Original Message -
From: Dragos Ruiu
To: Exibar
Cc: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| http://innu.org/~super/porkbind-1.2.tar.gz
It's http://innu.org/~super/tools/porkbind-1.2.tar.gz
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:05 AM, jf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
holly is not a researcher, iss puts everything under the x-force name,
they have a threat intelligence section which is mostly chicks spewing
crap about such things, i worked there and i have no idea where their
metrics came from.
nowhere near a few hundred thousand
On 30-Jul-08, at 12:29 PM, Exibar wrote:
There are quite a few credit unions and smaller savings
institutions that are not FDIC insured.
Not to mention all the FDIC insured savings institutions that are
worth less than $100 million
Exibar
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2008:159
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
does it really matter? It's certainly not 500.
BTW, just credit unions in the states amount to 8,130
We'll let the original poster worry about keeping his black list or
whitelist up to date, while the rest of us go on with our lives
Exibar
_
From: Dragos Ruiu [mailto:[EMAIL
On Sunday 27 Jul 2008, lsi wrote:
Soo y'all know not to click on those emails from your bank, or from
any other bank, in your inbox and now you just delete them ... why
not automate this process? It's easy, just filter a whole bunch of
banking names straight to your deleted items.
All you
27 matches
Mail list logo
