#
saxdax & drpepperONE
Discovered embedded backdoor to activate telnet/ftp/tftp/web extended
admin interface with Admin privileges, from internal network lan on
Alice ADSL CP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM, rysheve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So are you talking about Actionable Intelligence? Why should the
> government be gathering any intelligence on me unless I am the target
> of an investigation? Maybe I should also h
What would the scheme be?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:46 AM, vulcanius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should pursue something more realistic, like getting the FD list
> moderated.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:22 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> how can we start to make intelligence act
So are you talking about Actionable Intelligence? Why should the
government be gathering any intelligence on me unless I am the target
of an investigation? Maybe I should also have to register my I.D. to
any device that I connect to the Internet. I bet that would provide
lost of actionable
You should pursue something more realistic, like getting the FD list
moderated.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:22 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can we start to make intelligence actionable? how can we take
> intelligence from an idle state into an actionable state? what kind of
> schemes
how can we start to make intelligence actionable? how can we take
intelligence from an idle state into an actionable state? what kind of
schemes can we setup to make intelligence more actionable to locker
out the bad guys? what can we do as a community to get more of the
intelligence that is alread
The intelligence about who downloads metasploit is already there, but
currently it is not actionable intelligence.
The license scheme would start to make that intelligence actionable,
without the scheme, you've got intelligence sitting there that can't
be used in an actionable way.
Its all about
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Michael Simpson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/13/08, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:58 AM, vulcanius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Do you honestly believe such a thing could ever happen or are you just
>> > speculating for no
Any OSI-based set, but without enforcing security-through-obscurity concepts.
Maybe adapting some Bell-LaPadula ideas.
There are lots of models to discuss about. The real question however is:
can we start fresh?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >
> > * writing a whole new set of protocols to be used over a whole new
> > independent backbone infrastructure; and
>
> I suggest the OSI protocol stack, for the security-through-obscurity
> benefits. ASN.1, anybody? :)
>
GOSIP anyone?
I think the DMS was claimed to be more secure
since i
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:26:57 BST, n3td3v said:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, it *will* help. Just not help with bringing crime down.
>
> This in reality is nothing to do with crime, but to assist
> http://intelligence.gov.uk to do their job.
As I said - i
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:53:31 -0300, "M.B.Jr." said:
> * writing a whole new set of protocols to be used over a whole new
> independent backbone infrastructure; and
I suggest the OSI protocol stack, for the security-through-obscurity
benefits. ASN.1, anybody? :)
pgpjRQhOKvcxD.pgp
Description:
Dear n3td3v, the dreamer,
concerning your suggestion -- which is a noble one -- in a wider context,
you'd better start with two things:
* writing a whole new set of protocols to be used over a whole new
independent backbone infrastructure; and
* convincing the world to forget about TCP.
Be
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Michael Simpson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you appear to be the one desperate to meet up
>
>>if you want to meet up to sort out your issue, then arrange a
>>date...im sick of you spear targeting me, fuck off.
>
> lol you wanna hurt me :-)
>
you would most likely
Uninformed is pleased to announce the release of its 10th volume which is
composed of 4 articles:
Engineering in Reverse
- Can you find me now? Unlocking the Verizon Wireless xv6800 (HTC Titan)
GPS
Author: Skywing
- Using dual-mappings to evade automated unpackers
Author: skape
Exp
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:17:38 PDT, James Matthews said:
>
>> I think the irony of the situation is that they have their CCTV cameras for
>> years now and they didn't bring crime down. How will this database help?
>
> Oh, it *will* help.
On 10/13/08, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:58 AM, vulcanius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you honestly believe such a thing could ever happen or are you just
> > speculating for no reason?
>
> No I wasn't on drugs when I wrote this email... but mike simpson my
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
