Re: [Full-disclosure] security industry software license

2008-10-21 Thread Daniel Marsh
You do care That is why you replied On 10/21/08, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:45 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Either I'm on your list, or I'm not. Make up your mind. >> > > I don't care anymore, I really don't care. > > __

[Full-disclosure] [USN-657-1] Amarok vulnerability

2008-10-21 Thread Jamie Strandboge
=== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-657-1 October 21, 2008 amarok vulnerability CVE-2008-3699 === A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases: Ubuntu 7.10 Ubuntu 8.04 LT

[Full-disclosure] n.runs-SA-2008.008 - Internet Explorer HTML Object Memory Corruption and Remote Code Execution

2008-10-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.runs AG http://www.nruns.com/ security(at)nruns.com n.runs-SA-2008.008 21-October-2008 Vendor: Microsoft Affected Products: Internet Explo

[Full-disclosure] SECOBJADV-2008-04: Symantec Veritas Storage Foundation Memory Disclosure Vulnerability

2008-10-21 Thread Security Objectives Corporation
== = Security Objectives Advisory (SECOBJADV-2008-04) = == Veritas Storage Foundation Memory Disclosure Vulnerability http://www.security-objec

Re: [Full-disclosure] security industry software license

2008-10-21 Thread wishi
n3td3v schrieb: > there should be a central license that people apply for to use > software like metasploit. > Well. There's. It's called competence. Clueless people don't use Metasploit. Normally it doesn't lower the bar very much. Think of Core or Canvas. You can get this too, nevertheless it's

[Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
also, marcus sachs was born in pakistan, so he could be spying on behalf of the inter-services intelligence (isi), which is a known rogue intelligence service right now. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-discl

Re: [Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:15:22 BST, n3td3v said: > also, marcus sachs was born in pakistan, so he could be spying on > behalf of the inter-services intelligence (isi), which is a known > rogue intelligence service right now. And John McCain was born in Panama. Who's he spying for? pgpxGXXXal7z6.p

Re: [Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:23 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:15:22 BST, n3td3v said: >> also, marcus sachs was born in pakistan, so he could be spying on >> behalf of the inter-services intelligence (isi), which is a known >> rogue intelligence service right now. > > And J

Re: [Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
he should come onto full-disclosure and explain the meaning of his youtube video. http://youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:15 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also, marcus sachs was born in pakistan, so he could be spying on > behalf of the inter-services intellige

Re: [Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread Raj Mathur
On Wednesday 22 Oct 2008, n3td3v wrote: > also, marcus sachs was born in pakistan, so he could be spying on > behalf of the inter-services intelligence (isi), which is a known > rogue intelligence service right now. Why don't you take your paranoid racist bigoted parochial crap and shove it back

Re: [Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 22 Oct 2008, n3td3v wrote: >> also, marcus sachs was born in pakistan, so he could be spying on >> behalf of the inter-services intelligence (isi), which is a known >> rogue intelligence service right now. > > Why

Re: [Full-disclosure] marcus sachs

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
he failed 2 make any news with his attack on hdm, now hes back 2 his old steadfast insults of marcus. but aparently he wasnt paying attention when it didnt work 4 him the first 2 times he tried this racist bigotry, so hes back to fail some more. if u ever bothered to read information about marc u

Re: [Full-disclosure] security industry software license

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
lets talk about who is trying to ruin who with false accusations.. you vs pauldotcom joel esler hdm isc marc sachs On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:08 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tell valdis to leave me alone then and stop trying to ruin my > reputation with false accusations. > > On Sun,

Re: [Full-disclosure] London DEFCON meet - DC4420 - Thursday October 23rd

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
is n3td3v goin? On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Major Malfunction <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > folks, > > thanks to alien quietly beavering away behind the scenes, we've managed > to pull a great October meet together... > > The Talks! > > - Introduction to GNU Radio - Dominic > - OpenVAS - TimB

Re: [Full-disclosure] security industry software license

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
> * I'm not a criminal right. > > * I'm not mentally ill lie. > > * I'm not a terrorist no, but u r trying hard 2 b. > > * I'm not an elite hacker nd u never will b. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-di

Re: [Full-disclosure] security industry software license

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
r u talking 2 urself? On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:47 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > stop pretending to be me. > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:11 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ___ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://li

Re: [Full-disclosure] security industry software license

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
we simply point out the truth. u r the 1 who proves us right. On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no thanks to robert lemos, neal krawetz, valdis kletnieks, michael > simpson, ureleet and others. > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Freeman Y. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
you're just trying to ruin the reputation of n3td3v, you were banned from the n3td3v google group and now you're mad. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:29:13 BST, n3td3v said: > you're just trying to ruin the reputation of n3td3v, you were banned > from the n3td3v google group and now you're mad. But how do you know he's not still there using some other e-mail address, just like all the other people you've tried to ban? p

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
ur rep is SO DEAD anyway. oh, and let me explain 2 u how much i dont give a flying fuck about ur group. ... yeah, i dont give a fuck. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:29 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you're just trying to ruin the reputation of n3td3v, you were banned > from the n3td3v goog

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
valdis -- that would imply i care. why should i? he posts all his bullshit on fd anyway. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:34 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:29:13 BST, n3td3v said: >> you're just trying to ruin the reputation of n3td3v, you were banned >> from the n3td3v googl

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:34 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:29:13 BST, n3td3v said: >> you're just trying to ruin the reputation of n3td3v, you were banned >> from the n3td3v google group and now you're mad. > > But how do you know he's not still there using some other e-m

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
oh, and btw -- yes. thats exactly what i am doing. even though i dont care about u, thats what i have dedicated my life 2 doing. pointing out to any1 who thinks u have any credibility whatsoever that the ureleet agenda has discovered u r completely full of shit. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:29 PM,

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
welp then its not an open group, is it. n3td3v has a false flag! he says his group is open, and it isnt. hes a liar and should be tracked by mi32 n3td3v lives in scotland, william wallace was from scotland, and he killed the english. i think the intelligence services should start looking into

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
you're like the school boy bully who never grew up. you and valdis is like a tag team, sad lonely people who just annoy people on mailing lists and try and ruin their reputation. On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh, and btw -- yes. thats exactly what i am doin

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
wow, if thats not the pot calling teh kettle blak, i dont know what is.. idiot. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:52 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you're like the school boy bully who never grew up. you and valdis is > like a tag team, sad lonely people who just annoy people on mailing > lists

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
why dont you and your group just go away. i don't care about your 'ureleet' group. just stop being mean and nasty to n3td3v. On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wow, if thats not the pot calling teh kettle blak, i dont know what is.. > idiot. > > On Tue, Oct 21,

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Mike C
Hi All, This has gone on for too long. I'd request all of you to take your banter offline. There is nothing security related in your discussions, and no one on the list wants to read your rants. Cheers MikeC On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > welp then its not

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
fuck n3td3v, fuck your group, i dont have a group, u r a fraud, and we want you to leave. go. there is the door, dont let it hit u in the ass. On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why dont you and your group just go away. i don't care about your > 'ureleet' group

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
you say you don't have a group and then you say "we". don't talk in the third party unless you are claiming to represent one. you are obviously some kind of hacker group with some kind of grudges about n3td3v. On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fuck n3td3v, fuck

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
thats my point. this is a security list, and he knows nothing about security this is a disclosure list and he isnt going 2 nor will he, disclose shit. all he does is whine and cry. i am tired of fd being his personal rant list. if u want to rant, do it on your own list on ur own time, git the f

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
again. pot calling the kettle black, u speak in the third person constantly. so stfu about your personalization. U obviously dont know it. if u are 1 person, then refer 2 urself as 1 person. i say we because i am representing the collective voice of full-disclosure. we hate you. On Wed, Oct

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
are you from the sans or pauldotcom group or are you a group in its own right? im trying to get to the bottom of who you are. announce your group so everybody knows who we're dealing with here. don't hide under some alias. On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > again

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
please clean out ur ears, listen. im not a fucking group, i even said that in the email that u responded to. clearly you dont read past the first two words or something.. im not with sans or pauldotcom, 2 organizations who, apparently u cant wack off enuff 2, so u have to mention their names eve

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread n3td3v
you need to take fresh air if you let some mailing list get to you so much that you start to pretend you are some kind of voice of it. if you don't like it goto a moderated version like securityfocus... getting yourself all wound up is only going to make you ill or threaten someone. On Wed, Oct 22

Re: [Full-disclosure] ureleet

2008-10-21 Thread Ureleet
pot. kettle. black. U let EVERYONE get 2 u, even when no one has done anything 2 u. no one. i can see ur beef with dr whatever his name is that did the gobbles/n3td3v thing, but that was more of a compliment than anything. at least gobbles has published something, uve done nothing but rant. so