The law of bailment applies, I would submit, to information sent on
wires. The act of sending something out is not handing it to the public
domain (though it may arrive in the public domain, depending on intent).
However the law of bailments seems to have been ignored by many, even
though it has
Hello participants of Full-Disclosure!
I want to warn you about Denial of Service vulnerability in Internet
Explorer. Yesterday I already informed Microsoft.
This attack I called DoS via homepage.
DoS:
http://websecurity.com.ua/uploads/2009/IE%20DoS%20Exploit10.html
With this exploit in IE6
Hello participants of Full-Disclosure!
After the article Dark side of bookmarks (http://websecurity.com.ua/3643/),
I’ll draw you attention to another aspect of security which concerned with
web browsers. This time about attacks via homepage function. In article Dark
home
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Transport Layer Security Renegotiation
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20091109-tls
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20091109-tls.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 November 9 1600 UTC (GMT
I fail to see how that applies. The law of bailment basically means that
you continue to own a possession, the physical possession of which you
*temporarily* grant to another party. (Allowing someone to drive your car,
for example, but expecting them to return it when they're done.)
When you
The only property in a tweet or email is intellectual property, and that
remains the property of the sender... in my jurisdiction, at least, which
isn't even a US one.
Also, this is the most pathetic nerd-fight I have seen for many a year.
2009/11/10 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com
I
