On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:15:32 +0545, Bipin Gautam said:
> > it's a *bad* sector, so reading and recovering the data is a bitch...
>
> No, storing in Negative Disk, bad sector, stenography, slack space are
> all bad places to store data!
No, I meant it's usually not worth worrying that if the disk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thermite will definitely do, checkout
http://hackaday.com/2008/09/16/how-to-thermite-based-hard-drive-
anti-forensic-destruction/ and of course a .50 APIT round will do
as well:
http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/diskcrypt
/ind
> it's a *bad* sector, so reading and recovering the data is a bitch...
No, storing in Negative Disk, bad sector, stenography, slack space are
all bad places to store data!
In short, Flash memory may require multiple wipes before data is
securely deleted because many of them use uses wear-levelli
On 5/25/2010 5:01 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> It's not worth worrying about wiping the remapped sectors on a disk - even an
> older 40G drive has some 80 million sectors on it - so even if you have a few
> hundred sectors that have remapped due to I/O errors, it's still literally
> a on
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, wrote:
> It's not worth worrying about wiping the remapped sectors on a disk - even an
> older 40G drive has some 80 million sectors on it - so even if you have a few
> hundred sectors that have remapped due to I/O errors, it's still literally
> a one-in-a-million
On Wed, 26 May 2010 03:01:26 +0545, Bipin Gautam said:
> @Valdis: Those were from some ooold notes, (~4yrs) :) if you have full
> hdd encryption wiping hdd header and backup header few (7?) times and
> rest hdd with 1 random pass should be enough.
My point is that even if the drive *wasn't* encry
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:08:45PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu spake thusly:
> There is zero evidence that anybody is able to recover data after even a
> single overwrite of /dev/zero on a disk drive made this century. Even in
Quite right. I did some research on this last year when I had a pil
===
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-944-1 May 25, 2010
glibc, eglibc vulnerabilities
CVE-2008-1391, CVE-2010-0296, CVE-2010-0830
===
A security issue affects the following Ubunt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2010:107
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
@Christian : You, EFF research is no big deal. If you noticed the
article was written
[On Wed, Feb 20, 2008]
www.mail-archive.com/foss-ne...@googlegroups.com/msg04248.html
>From open source only rare few people like Henrik Gemal, (
http://browserspy.dk/ ) are known people to have early knowledge
(
By the way, as to EFF's "research" everyone is bragging about; it's no big
deal.
I mean, seriously, I present my clients with a PDF download page only if
their browser can't embed it. How did I do it?
Some magic ultra-secret javascript to detect which browser plugins are
installed and mime-types s
Valdis, you're wrong.
Give me another century and I'll prove it to you.
:-)
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:08 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:25:25 +0545, Bipin Gautam said:
>
> Rest of article actually looks good at first glance, but this jumped out at
> me:
>
> > > -Software disk Wiping:
> >
On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:25:25 +0545, Bipin Gautam said:
Rest of article actually looks good at first glance, but this jumped out at me:
> > -Software disk Wiping:
> > Wipe KEY, header of your encrypted storage volume (first few mb, ref
> > specific manual) Ref using Peter Gutmann standard of data
Following is a linkedin posting from a discussion group. This is just
a random note for archive purpose. I lack interest to write this
article in details. The article and content are of poor quality so
ignore.. :)
thanks,
-bipin
Stealthier Internet access
Oh my G!
I'm going to quote that site next time I get to help a *nix newbie figure
out permissions without sudo.
Seriously by that reason I could accuse linux users of exerting too much
freedom giving the allusion of godly control - which as you might have
guessed is a "sin".
...unless you red
Hey kids, whazup?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Thor (Hammer of God)
wrote:
> If you are still running Windows 95 that's your problem.
Nevertheless, if one runs Windows 7, here is the problem:
http://en.windows7sins.org/
Regards,
Marcio Barbado, Jr.
_
Hi there,
i am in bangalore, (karnataka state), India
Lot of internet hackers coming to india, we are talking in different
frequency,
if your coming to india, bangalore, please feel free to contact me,
my email id jaikumar.shi...@gmail.com
thanks for supporting me, from Def Con and Black Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2053-1secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/ dann frazier
May 25, 2010h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2052-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/ Sebastien Delafond
May 24, 2010
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2052-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/ Sebastien Delafond
May 24, 2010
wow, doesn't time fly when planes don't? :P
if, like me, you've been stuck in the UK, admiring the ash cloud and
listening to the chants of the soon to be unemployed trolley dollies,
you'll be glad of the distraction of a couple of pints, a decent pie and
some evil hax0r learning hammered into
21 matches
Mail list logo
