-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
VMware Security Advisory
Advisory ID: VMSA-2010-0010
Synopsis: ESX 3.5 third party update for Service Console kernel
Issue date:2010-0
Ok, so let them make it mandatory.
Everyone will just run Fake AV.
Business as usual.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Rejoice in a righteous man's persecution at your peril.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:54 PM, T Biehn wrote:
> Ouch dude:
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2010/06/23/tor-g20-arrest.html
>
> Guess you ate a dick too.
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Byron Sonne wrote:
>
>> > Looks like An
Sagan release version 0.1.0
http://sagan.softwink.com
Written by Champ Clark (AKA 'Da Beave') and the Softwink, Inc team
Date: 06/24/2010
Softwink announces the release of Sagan, the ultimate in Syslog monitoring.
Sagan can alert you when events are occurring in your syslogs that need your
atten
On 6/24/10 3:54 PM, T Biehn wrote:
> Ouch dude:
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2010/06/23/tor-g20-arrest.html
>
> Guess you ate a dick too.
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Byron Sonne wrote:
>
>>> Looks like Andrew/weev/n3td3v finally gets to do what he likes the most
>>> Perform
Ouch dude:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2010/06/23/tor-g20-arrest.html
Guess you ate a dick too.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Byron Sonne wrote:
> > Looks like Andrew/weev/n3td3v finally gets to do what he likes the most
> > Performing fellatio on his fellow inmates
> > http://www
Hello Full-Disclosure!
I want to warn you about security vulnerabilities in plugin Cimy Counter for
WordPress.
-
Advisory: Vulnerabilities in Cimy Counter for WordPress
-
URL: http://websecurity.com.ua/4170/
-
Aff
hey man chill
he might look like a cracksmoking streetbum but he has millions in hus
panamanian accounts!
the paypal donation thing is just a front!
2010/6/23 Jubei Trippataka
> But if you look like this you deserve it:
>
> http://pics.livejournal.com/weev/pic/00090a2r/s640x480
>
> Funny cuz it'
PAINSEC SECURITY RESEARCH GROUP SECURITY ADVISORY 2010-001
- Original release date: June 24th, 2010
- Discovered by: Jose Carlos de Arriba (dade (at) painsec (dot) com)
- Severity: 10/10 (Base CVSS Score)
=
Thor - Zealand is where your wife was born.
On Jun 23, 2010, at 1:25 PM, "Thor (Hammer of God)"
mailto:t...@hammerofgod.com>> wrote:
I know better than to bring up the “Australia” vs “New Zealand” bit.
Speaking of which, was there an “Old Zealand?” ;)
t
=[ Tempest Security Intelligence - Advisory #02 / 2010 ]===
Vulnerability => [ 'Apache Axis Session Fixation Vulnerability' ]
Authors=> ['Tiago Ferreira '
'Leandro Oliveira ' ]
[ Table of Contents ]===
Hey Thor, everything is well mate.
Firstly I think you may have missed the context of this bug, which was not
apparent from my first post.
I spend a lot of time working on the security of internet Kiosks, Citrix
terminals and other thin-clients.
In these situations, users are often blocked from
=[ Tempest Security Intelligence - Advisory #02 / 2010 ]===
Vulnerability => [ 'Apache Axis Session Fixation Vulnerability' ]
Authors=> ['Tiago Ferreira '
'Leandro Oliveira ' ]
[ Table of Contents ]===
Advisory Name: Arbitrary File Download in InterScan Web Security Virtual
Appliance 5.0
Internal Cybsec Advisory Id: 2010-0606
Vulnerability Class: Arbitrary File Download
Release Date: To be confirmed
Affected Applications: Confirmed in InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance
5.0
Advisory Name: Arbitrary File Upload in InterScan Web Security Virtual
Appliance 5.0.
Internal Cybsec Advisory Id: 2010-0605
Vulnerability Class: Arbitrary File Upload
Release Date: 22-06-2010
Affected Applications: Confirmed in InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance
5.0. Other
Advisory Name: Local Privilege Escalation in InterScan Web Security Virtual
Apliance 5.0
Internal Cybsec Advisory Id: 2010-0604
Vulnerability Class: Local Privilege Escalation
Release Date: 22-06-2010
Affected Applications: InterScan Web Security Virtual Aplliance 5.0. Other
versi
Hello,
As You all must be aware of this meet, but we haven't sent
Meets Agenda and timing , So here we go
1) 'Windows Registry Tricks n its Bugs' by Gaurav arora (Security
Enthusiast)
2) 'Access List' by Anuj Tyagi (CCNA, Security Researcher)
3) 'Is it time to hack fridge' by Alok Sinha (Se
On 23 Jun 2010 at 19:23, Jan Schejbal wrote:
> It would be interesting to compare the damage actually avoided by virus
> scanners to the damages and costs they cause (including false-positives
> wiping out system files, the hassle with updates/deployment and the cost
> of the products).
The mathe
I wonder if someone writes down all that pseudo-intellectual philosophical
bullshit that is so carefully crafted by FD members (myself included)?
Maybe I should:
???
Profit
-Travis
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Walter van Holst <
walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, June 24, 2010 11:0
On Thu, June 24, 2010 11:08, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> The answer to that kind of question is quite often related to the
>> industry average. For example no more failures than one standard
>> deviation below the industry average.
>
> Ahh.. but that doesn't really help either. Consider tha
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:47:01 +0200, Walter van Holst said:
> The answer to that kind of question is quite often related to the
> industry average. For example no more failures than one standard
> deviation below the industry average.
Ahh.. but that doesn't really help either. Consider that not a
On Thu, June 24, 2010 09:42, Cor Rosielle wrote:
> ...snip...
>> The product that fail miserably, throughout the year(s?) should be
>> declared "unfit for purpose" ...like an expired food which is
>> harmful for health.
>
> Basically it is an interesting thought. I see a challenge though. Is 3
I recognize that. You'll learn fast to turn off your anti virus software
when you want to use cain, netcat and a lot more. The anti virus software
doesn't only "protect" you against attacks, but it also prevent you to
"attack" others.
Cor
> -Original Message-
> From: full-disclosure-boun.
...snip...
> The product that fail miserably, throughout the year(s?) should be
> declared "unfit for purpose" ...like an expired food which is
> harmful for health.
Basically it is an interesting thought. I see a challenge though. Is 3
failures per year miserable? Or should we raise the limit
24 matches
Mail list logo
