===
Ubuntu Security Notice USN-978-2 September 16, 2010
thunderbird regression
https://launchpad.net/bugs/640839
===
A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:
Ubun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2010:184
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
_
Shit man, I was keeping notes for my class in pedantry, can't you two keep
it going for a few more days?
-Travis
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Stefan Kanthak wrote:
> Christian Sciberras wrote:
>
> >> Yes. Once again: get your homework done!
> >>
> >>> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/DLL/dynami
If you do not actually need to run any 32bits binaries on x86_64 you can
do:
echo ':32bits:M:0:\x7fELF\x01::/bin/echo:' > /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/register
This will make the kernel run /bin/echo filename instead of executing
the file whenever it sees a 32bit ELF binary.
Of course if you actua
Christian Sciberras wrote:
>> Yes. Once again: get your homework done!
>>
>>> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/DLL/dynamicdllloading.aspx
>>
>> That's a double DYNAMIC there!
>
> Did you even bother to read the article? The very first paragraph
> states the difference between the two.
>
> Oh, and f
Christian Sciberras wrote:
>> No. Guess where the D in DLL comes from!
>> Static linking occurs when the linker builds a binary (this might be a
>> DLL.-) using *.OBJ and *.LIB.
>> Dynamic linking occurs when the loader loads a binary (again: this might
>> be a DLL) into memory and resolves its de
Christian Sciberras wrote:
>> and failed to use it right!
>
> Well, I suppose I could have used neat tricks such as specifically and
> directly loading the "bad" dll.
> But as much as security goes, those are cheap tricks.
Wrong again! You dont need tricks, you need to understand Windows' DLL
se
Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Kanthak
> wrote:
>> Dan Kaminsky wrote:
>>> Short version: Go see how many DLLs exist outside of c:\windows\system32.
>>> Look, ye mighty, and despair when you realize all those apps would be broken
>>> by CWD DLL blocking.
>>
>> No,
