Actually, you did ask him to read it. You asked everyone to read it by posting
it. That's the way this works. If you can't handle criticism for moronic
advisories, then *you* are the one who needs to keep it to yourself.
T
Sent from whatever device will keep us from debating which one is bet
On 2012-07-30, at 07:41, Pablo Ximenes wrote:
> I'd like to share with you one of my findings that failed to get
> Google's Security Reward. Although Google doesn't consider it a
> security problem, some might find it at least amusing if not
> interesting.
>From the linked article, http://ximen.e
Hi Folks,
I'd like to share with you one of my findings that failed to get
Google's Security Reward. Although Google doesn't consider it a
security problem, some might find it at least amusing if not
interesting.
Check it out: http://ximen.es/?p=653
Sorry for typos, cross posting, and lack of ac
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Scott Solmonson wrote:
>
> Funny, I now want to watch Goldeneye for some reason...
Funnier is now I want to watch Dumb and Dumber for obvious reason.
>
>
> Everything you mention are parts of critical infrastructure.
> Any organization/nation that claims to have
wait, this was a serious email? not like this bro, not like this.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:08 PM, kaveh ghaemmaghami
wrote:
> I think ur on vacation now aren't u Plus nobody ask u to read my
> post and i am not interested about ur opinion keep it for yourself
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2012:110-1
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
_
I think ur on vacation now aren't u Plus nobody ask u to read my
post and i am not interested about ur opinion keep it for yourself
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:21 PM, kaveh ghaemmaghami
wrote:
> Exploit Title: AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC
> Crash : http://imageshack.us/f/217