On 03/23/2012 07:26 PM, Michal Zalewski wrote:
>> I find it very unfortunate that 300 supposed security professionals clicked
>> on a hidden link like that without first checking what it was, or if not
>> simply ignoring it like I did!!!
>
> So how do you meaningfully "check what it is" without act
On 04/05/2012 10:30 AM, RandallM wrote:
> can someone tell me what effects there are to being infected with
> flashback? signs? google search just brings up the same same news
> stories.
>
> also, if one is.. it seems there are some files that cannot be
> recovered so new install necessary?
>
No p
On 04/26/2012 08:45 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> From: Michal Zalewski
>>
>>> A you-only-get-it-when-successful 20,000$ budget from Google is insulting,
>>> considering the perhaps massive time
>>> investment from the researcher. [...] and yet they only pay a nice
>>> researcher 20 grand? You can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2010 12:52 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On December 17, 2010 12:31:37 PM -0500 Larry Seltzer
> wrote:
>
>>> The one thing Mr. Perry has not done, and which, if his claims have any
>>> merit at all, he could easily do, since he claims he's no
Don't think so, just prune off the www. and it works fine.
~c
Suzuki Kawasaki wrote:
> Was OpenBSD owned ... http://www.openbsd.org
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclos
