Or just go to http://vx.netlux.org
On 8/5/05, M4ch3T3 Hax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have recently graduated from a computers & networking course at
> university and have spent alot of my time analysing network security
> from a scanning/sniffing/hardening point of view.
>
> I
Probobly since in rthe new Phrack it says Phrack will start again with
a new staff in 2006/2007 and this guy is mailing from a gmail addy
so
On 8/1/05, Dinis Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Surely this is a hoax?
>
> Dinis Cruz
> .Net Security Consultant
>
> Phrack Staff wrote:
> [-]
well they seem to only publish old articles, articles i guess they
dont got authorization to publish.
On 7/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sumy wrote:
> > [...] Don't worry if you have at least a floppy rescue disk under
> > hand,you can root it ;-) )
> >
> > The problem with
that has to be like the worst backdooring ever. The printf()'s are not
even there :P
On 4/20/05, Day Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, the previous code was broken. This code should
> work...
>
> Happy Owning!! :)
>
> =SNIP
> /* Proof of concept code
>Please don't s
I don't understand why you add very old tutorials that can allready be
easily found on the net and I really don't understand why you have to
email the lists everytime you add one text.
It only brings more noise to the lists.
If you publish a unique and new tutorial, mail to the list then, not
if yo
Since I guess this organization represent the company that has
developed this software they should have the right to download the
software which doesn't mean they are doing something illegal just
because he is doing an illegal thing.
On Apr 7, 2005 5:48 AM, Thomas Sutpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why are you sending this to the list? so you share copy-righted
software, that is illegal as far as I know and this has nothing to do
with full-disclosure?
On Apr 4, 2005 8:47 PM, Jason Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RE: Unauthorized Distribution of
> > the following copyrighted computer
>
I heard that Theo is actually hired by Red Hat and that the whole
OpenBSD project is gonna be bought by Red Hat.
On Apr 1, 2005 8:57 AM, Georgi Guninski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there are persistent rumors supported by check-ins on cvs.openbsd.org
> in private -GPL branch that openbsd 3.8 will
trings you would pretty much get away with it.
We'll see what happends with this.
// Dunceor
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:51:50 -0500, Kristian Hermansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I became interested in this whole debate recently and wanted to get to
> the bottom of it all (in the i
