-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fiat licensure laws are invariably used (if not intended) to restrict new
entrants in a profession. The idea is to benefit existing members in that
profession (who are grandfathered into licensure by virtue of having
worked in that profession for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone tried setting the HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session
Manager\Memory Management\MoveImages key (which, by default, does not
exist) so as to mandate ASLR coverage (value of -1 to mandate coverage on
all PEs)? Anyone had success (or big
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Suggestion - check out the array of good security blogs if you're not
already doing so.
G
- - Original Message -
From: Lucio Crusca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:46 AM
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Responding to such playground tactics will only perpetuate the
foolishness, as has already been demonstrated repeatedly. For the sake of
everyone, I strongly recommend you just add him/they to your filter list.
G
- - Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Again, please add annoying/offensive people to your email filters. Keep in
mind that, to them, any attention at all is good, even if it's negative
attention.
G
- - Original Message -
From: Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: n3td3v [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And situations involving social interaction are not for you. Please avoid
them at all costs until social skills improve.
Oh, and please read the list charter that was recently distributed. On it,
you will see that offensive language and personal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Add offensive list subscribers to your email filter rather than baiting
them to continue their offensive posts.
- - Original Message -
From: Robert Holgstad
To: Professor Micheal Chatner ; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Monday,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That's why there are email filters. Pls start using them if you value your
sanity. The kind of publicity he/they're getting only encourages the
naughty behavior.
- - Original Message -
From: Patrick Nolan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No begging necessary, Michael. Just update your email filters to weed out
offensive or junk email.
- - Original Message -
From: Micheal Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:35 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Appeal to them with language that they understand. Since they don't seem to
be as technical as you are, appeal to them with a financial and/or legal
liability argument. Managers understand liability and the bottom line.
- - Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep, agreed.
- - G
Salut, Garrett,
On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:51:29 -0400, Garrett M. Groff wrote:
Generating pseudo-random numbers isn't hard given a good API, but
writing that API is non-trivial (assuming you want high entropy/low
predictability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think it's time to cut out this anti-semitic crap. It violates the list
charter and it's just embarrassing (to those who hold such hateful
opinions). If you want to be complicit in hateful propaganda that echoes
that of the mindless Islamic fascism
.
J
On Fri, 09 May 2008 11:33:05 -0400 Garrett M. Groff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's time to cut out this anti-semitic crap. It violates
the list
charter and it's just embarrassing (to those who hold such hateful
opinions). If you want to be complicit in hateful propaganda that
echoes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not silly to point that out at all. I borrowed the media term du jour
(Islamic fascists, or alternately, Islamofascists). I typically use the
term Salafist radicals since it's more technically correct and less
inflammatory (well, not necessarily on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These sorts of emails, while perhaps very accurate, only encourage a
barrage of emails concerning our apparent involvement in a large
governmental conspiracy and/or our script kiddiness. I think ignoring
such emails from netdev are in order, tempting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For the people who normally send this sort of filth, can you please do one
or both of the following:
1) send to the person and not the entire list
2) indicate the off-topicness of the email in the subject line
Alternately, you can just not send
Joey,
The topic write-ups for data compression and cryptography (go to that page
in lieu of encryption) are reasonably good. You can then branch to other
sources for the sake of verification via cross referencing. That should help
to elucidate the substantial difference between encrypting data
] Security issue in
Filezilla3.0.9.2:passwordsare stored in plain text (sitemanager.xml)
Groffg,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:02:34 -0400 Garrett M. Groff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joey,
The topic write-ups for data compression and cryptography (go to
that page
in lieu of encryption) are reasonably
Pretty shocking stuff. I seriously recommend a scholarly, peer-reviewed book
on basic social skills.
In addition, finding a role model who has both strong domain knowledge (in
the field of your choice) and also who communicates effectively (i.e.,
without losing his/her equanimity when faced
Richard, would you have objections to pasting your email to the group?
- G
- Original Message -
From: Richard Golodner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 4:19 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Misquoted here on FD...
Clearly someone has
Joey, Wikipedia has some decent write-ups on both compression and
encryption. Understanding those concepts would be helpful before tackling
RFCs. Hope that helps.
- G
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:31:53 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
So are you trying to suggest compression is not as secure as
issue in Filezilla 3.0.9.2:passwords
are stored in plain text (sitemanager.xml)
I disagree, read the RFC. There are plenty of more secure FTP
clients such as the OpenSSH.com groups proactive secure Secure FTP
(sftp) implementation of FTP.
J
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:36:34 -0400 Garrett M. Groff
Joey, are you certain that you're looking at RFC 959? There is no 4.3.3
section in RFC 959.
- G
- Original Message -
From: Joey Mengele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 4:26 PM
Subject: Re:
Fools! Do you really want to be added to Netdev's List of Enemies To Be
Smitten? More on what happens to Netdev's enemies here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fate_Of_N3tD3v_Enemies
- G
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mcwidget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
FYI - my previous email was entirely facetious. To my knowledge, a list
entitled List of Enemies To Be Smitten does not exist (yet?) and the
referenced Wikipedia page is merely a fabrication.
- G
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:03:11 EDT, Garrett M. Groff said:
Fools! Do you really want to be added
I appreciate Valdis's point and agree with it. I'll posit that there is an
optimal balance that can be achieved vis-a-vis security. I'll use airport
security as my example. In this case, security theater becomes a political
necessity (fed gov't needs to look responsive after 9/11 to re-assure
Allow me to posit the following: netdev wants attention, even if its
negative attention. I.e., he is intentionally saying things that are
inflammatory/unintelligent/provocative so as to arouse a reaction.
To say that this is out of stupidity (or that netdev is unintelligent) is a
conclusion
Good point regarding English grammar. I would definitely dissent with
someone who proved to be inordinately picky regarding sentence construction
or style.
Still, good grammar and judicious use of writing style has its uses. Here
are two: professionalism and persuasiveness (yes, they're not
Fact is, n3td3v, we're all out to get you. I apologize for not mentioning
that earlier.
Oh, the NSA is after you as well and is actively involved in the smear
campaign. Why? Because, due to your extensive security research, you are a
potential threat. At some point you'll be abducted, but I
and, perhaps, there are people who appreciate the
information.
- G
- Original Message -
From: n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Garrett M. Groff [EMAIL PROTECTED]; n3td3v
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure
Another approach is that you could stop reading her blog and seek an
alternate past-time(s). That would avoid the commission of computer crime
and its possible ramifications.
- G
- Original Message -
From: josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cody Roby [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Although, in all seriousness, I can imagine physical world things being
compromised, possibly via software attacks alone (or, equally likely, a single
disgruntled employee). Allow me to explain using a particular example: safes.
Companies that make safes (be they old-fashioned mechanical or
Excellent points, with exception to the gratuitious name-calling (just b/c
there are annoying people on this list who throw out invective doesn't mean
we should submit to our temptation to do the same vile practice back to
them).
I'll add the following (despite the fact that it's grossly
exterior connectivity.
The strategic vision that I'm suggesting is that we use our global power
projection as the initial phase in taking out stubborn regimes. That's a
small part of the picture, but still a necessary piece.
- G
- Original Message -
From: [REMOVED]
To: Garrett M. Groff
Not commenting on the perceived misunderstanding, but I'll post a couple
thoughts...
One, I disagree with the rogueness of the US (beyond that, the debate is
semantics, methinks). Having said that, I'm not particularly fond of the
current administration and I hope the next president expresses
Your concern in our off-topicness is indeed justified. We have strayed far
from the primary topic of the list.
- G
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Free Iraq
that for an IT security tie-in?). I propose that we (and certainly
our political luminaries) have a strategic mindset in this flatter and
more globalized world that we live in.
- G
- Original Message -
From: Razi Shaban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Garrett M. Groff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: full
Maybe the relevance of this post is escaping me. Over the weekend, quite a
few unread FD emails were purged to make the task of catching up a little
more bearable...
But I'll bite. Regarding China, as they've been liberalizing their economy
for nearly the last three decades, personal freedoms
Can emails like the one below be sent to the person not the entire list...
for the benefit of all list members? Thanks.
- G
- Original Message -
From: reepex
To: Petko D. Petkov ; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure]
39 matches
Mail list logo
