-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:04:00 -0500
From: Andrew C Burnette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [ NNSquad ] Verizon's access via their provided Actiontec MoCa router
Hey folks,
In discussion with Lauren (
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:29:35 +0100
From: "Weger, B.M.M. de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PlayStation 3 predicts next US president
Hi all,
We (Marc Stevens, Arjen Lenstra and me) have used a Sony Play
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On November 1, 2007 10:14:50 PM -0400 Jay Sulzberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> --On November 1
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's an interesting figure (86% that is). Can you give us some
> insight into what you define as "user interaction"?
>
> If it is clicking a link or reading an HTML email, then OK. If it is
> opening an .exe from an email,
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On November 1, 2007 6:31:39 PM -0400 "Adam St. Onge"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more
>> you must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf".
>>
>>
>> Would we cons
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Adam St. Onge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if i put a picture of a naked girl on a website and said to see more you
> must open a terminal and enter "rm -rf".
> Would we consider this a trojan...or just stupidity?
Yes, a Trojan. Yes, stupidity on the part of the designer
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Jones, Jeff (Enterprise Security) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> UNSUBSCRIBE
>
> Jeffrey A. Jones
http://crackmonkey.org/faq.html#QUESTION3
oo--JS.
> Constellation Energy Group,
> Engineering & Forensics- Information Security Management
> (443) 394-2959
> mailto: [EMAIL PRO
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:45:08 -0400
From: WWWhatsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Discuss] Public comments are invited on GNSO Council's WHOIS reports
and recommendations.
h
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:23:57 +1200
From: Peter Gutmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: World's most powerful supercomputer goes online
This doesn't seem to have received much attention, but the world's most
powerful superc
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, J. Oquendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H D Moore wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some friends and I were putting together a contact list for the folks
>> attending the Defcon conference this year in Las Vegas. My friend sent out
>> an email, with a large CC list, asking people to
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Muscarella, Sebastian \(IT\) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wanted to ask this forum's opinion on the state of macro threats. While
> we have not seen too many this past year which were actively exploited,
> we wanted to know if there are any indications on whether this threat
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:32:47 -0500
From: Aaron Hackney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [tech-geeks] OT: Local computer shop is getting sued by NBA Spurs
player
As many of you may or not kn
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:04:06 -0700
From: Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] Gutsy Gibbon to include strictly-free branch
On 16/04/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Poof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issues that the original poster is having don't sound anything like
> normal behavior. One of the scenarios expected in Vista would be a Laptop
> that's been activated being used in a restricted internet work zone. And if
> that laptop ha
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:24:44 -0500
From: David P. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VT receives NSF grant for SDR security
Greg - I think the concept of "software defined radio" being explore
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Nancy Kramer wrote:
> You are 100 percent right about the US government. The US Constitution may
> protect US citizens from the government but nothing will protect them from
> the big telecom companies who will own them and their data unless we enact
> a new neutrality law i
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 09:00:51 -0700
From: Anthony Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: No List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Privacy] Sexbaiting Social Experiment on Craigslist Affects Hundreds
Hey MB,
Was just trolling through some of my RSS feeds and
17 matches
Mail list logo