On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Mike Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike C wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, rholgstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| and how does making a color based on these inputs protect people?
|
|
| Once all
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Elazar Broad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:50:46 -0500 rholgstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike C wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, rholgstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and how does making
Hye Guys,
I though we had settled the issues offline. Lets restart our
discussions.. this bickering is highly unnecessary on the list.
--
MC
Security Researcher
Lead, Project Chroma
http://sites.google.com/site/projectchromaproject/
___
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hes not a troll andrew. he brings up good points. u nd i are the
only trolls here. i only troll u. you troll every1.
Yes, acceptance is he first stage of recovery for the both of you. Let
us continue with the offline
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, rholgstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and how does making a color based on these inputs protect people?
Once all desktops have an icon or widget (say at the right hand
corner) with the color, and this is consistently seen everywhere, the
users will start associating
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Joel Helgeson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree - the biggest BS term in existence is the term Cyberterror. If my
web server crashes, is it the result of a Jihadist? Do I care?
Yes! The kind of exploiter decides the kind of evil thing that would
be done from a
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:21 AM, vulcanius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I also noticed that the new site for your project has the
current threat level as yellow. Is it safe to assume that you've already got
your metric systems in place and running?
Yes,
We do have a working framework
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:36 AM, rholgstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you actually want to go this route after seeing dhs being laughed at
daily with their retarded color scheme? You realize that color schemes do
nothing for real security and are just more policy BS right?
A well implemented
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 Dec 2008, vulcanius wrote:
[snip] is n3td3v's abstract world [more snip]
Er, they're the same person!
And you are Gordon Brown. Really. Believe me, even though I'm not from
linux-delhi.org
--
MC
Security
.
http://isc.sans.org/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:full-disclosure-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike C
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 9:35 PM
To: Full Disclosure
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Project Chroma: A color code for the state
ofcyber security
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:51 PM, vulcanius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So have you actually come up with a feasible metric for measuring the
current state of malicious/non-malicious traffic on the tubes vs the current
Yes. I;m working with industry insiders and we have a set of tangible
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 Nov 2008, n3td3v wrote:
Indian-Pakistan war is about to kick off folks...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7757031.stm
I know it's not going to happen, but can I request you once again shut
the
Hi,
It is time to take an example from Homeland Security and define codes
of color for cyber-warfare threat levels. I propose the following:
Green level: There is negligible threat to online security.
Yellow level : There is a minimal level of threat, and this must be
monitored and contained.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:11 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Mike C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 Nov 2008, n3td3v wrote:
Indian-Pakistan war is about to kick off folks
Hey n3td3v/ureleet,
Lets keep working on the offline resolution of the personal issues here,
before we continue back on the mailing list. This will be for the better of
security research industry.
--
MC
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:27 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its time to break the
Just noting that I was contacted offline by the author of this tool, and
informed that the project will have regular updates. those looking forward
to it's progress will be glad.
--
MC
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
may be the reason for the flamish mails. I'll update the list
as to the progress here)
--
MC
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this just in: mike c says n3td3v's group is pointless and redundant
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Mike C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
kept elsewhere and
not among serious security researchers.
I'll update the list once the discussions bear fruit.
--
MC
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:44 PM, John Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike C,
I'm a long time lurker on FD, and I'm trying to organise a month long
IGNOREATHON where nobody
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:00 AM, don bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, for now, i am gone. n3td3v, u r a disgrace 2 the community by
calling urself 1 of us.
I really wish you would stay. You and n3td3v are destroying
the full-disclosure community. That's a good thing. Keep
bantering,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:40 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike C
i'd just like to clarify that as of yet I'm not a part of your group as a
matter of principle. there is a far more focussed and serious mailing list
where this stuff belongs.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ureleet
2008/11/25 pst axis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anehta is an open source XSS Attack Platform which is maintained by
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Home: http://anehta.googlecode.com
Demo Video:
http://hi.baidu.com/aullik5/blog/item/cb4cd5899283b093a4c272a9.html
Online Demo:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:03 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:57 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Memisyazici, Aras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
M$ should just bite the incompatibility bullet and turn NTLM off
/snip
No! not without losing a big big advantage it enjoys over other platforms.
This will render god-knows-how-many binary apps useless and
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Benjamin Mossé [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Date: 25th of November, 2008
1. What is Browser Rider?
Browser Rider is a hacking framework to build payloads that exploit the
browser.
The project aims to provide a powerful, simple and flexible interface to
any
I have previously had long discussions with a lawyer friend, who has assured
me that it is quite alright for copyrighted material to be quoted for
critical analysis. This information should prove helpful here.
--
MC
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:47 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gadi Evron
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:20 PM, imipak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exibar wrote:
wow, disabling files to run from the root of all drives would never, ever
fly in a corporate environment. Although I do like the idea on stopping
autorun malware, it would work... but oh the calls to the
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:16 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:33 PM
Subject: Comment on: 2 engineers from China sentenced for espionage
To: n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by n3td3v November
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Mike C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi n3td3v,
Thanks for the update. Going by the recent history, I can see that there
will be some comments deriding your posting, but there are those
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:47 PM, James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can work the BBC website myself just fine, cheers
Yes, but it is statistically more likely you will read this if n3td3v posts
it here. Thus his posting. I sense an air of hostility towards this security
researcher, and
Hi All,
This has gone on for too long. I'd request all of you to take your banter
offline. There is nothing security related in your discussions, and no one
on the list wants to read your rants.
Cheers
MikeC
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
welp then its not
30 matches
Mail list logo
