On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:56:20 BST, nEtdEv said:
> Security threater is good because it scares potential terrorists from
> being caught. It keeps the terrorists on their toes and worrying all
> the time.
...
> Usually airports combine security threater and real security together,
> and thats got to
Defence in depth is in question? After more than 20 years in compsec,
the fallacy of the argument that defence in depth is dead is ironic.
D.I.D. means that if defence A fails, B comes in. If B fails C comes in
then D. etc. Though pdp is a very inventive youngster, it takes a few
grey hairs to mast
I haven't followed all of this rather strange thread, but I wonder if
n_td_v, gobble_ and the venerable Doctor may be one and the same group?
After all few educated individuals would be likely to be so pretentious
as to declare themselves as both Dr and PhD? As if we might confuse the
guy, on this
Schmehl
Sent: 17 May 2006 19:27
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
Pete Simpson wrote:
> You have confirmed that the data are correct, you have no way to
> attack the principles, so where is the logical error? Be very precise.
@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
Pete Simpson wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Again I will simply say, refute the data, the principles or the logic.
> Furthermore 'ad hominem' attacks just diminish your position.
>
Clearly you've bookmarked the argu
Paul S wrote:
>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/dyk.html
>"Each building collapsed in about ten seconds, hitting the ground with
>an estimated speed of about 125 miles per hour."
>"The collapse was a near free-fall. With no restraint, the collapse
>would have taken eight seconds and would have
disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
Pete Simpson wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Of all people you surprise me with this dishonest trick of argument -
> appeal to authority. Challenge either the data, the principles or the
> logic.
>
Oh spare me.
quot;pull the other one".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2006 01:58
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
--On May 16, 2006 11:48:01 PM +010
You are a commercial pilot and an engineer? Where did you qualify in
engineering, because it would appear that you have overlooked some of
the most elementary principles of physics?
The official US government account of the destruction of the World Trade
Center Twin Towers consists of the Federal
Some facts and logic may prove useful.
Why do you think that the US government would wish to spy on its own citizens?
Ah-ah - Islamo-terrorist sleeper cells have infiltrated the US for possibly a
decade. First examine the terrorist angle and then return to the necessity for
internal spying.
Ni
10 matches
Mail list logo
