Unlikely, usually these switches are quite large and when a user has OOB it
usually means console access to the server, i.e. nothing to do with network
topology.
If they are like most ISPs/carriers, the only thing that will be on a
separate switch is their management network(s).
On 16 March 2012
What makes you think those services would be split onto separate switches
(which would be rather odd actually)?
On 16 March 2012 16:30, Jerry dePriest wrote:
> They had a DoS of mail, www and shell. They state a switch went out. who
> runs mail, www and shell on the same switch?
>
> (This migh
RFC3986 marks both # and ! as reserved characters (sec 2.2); from a skim
read, # is used for fragment identification (somewhere in sec 3) and there
is a small note on ! ' and " at the end of the document. More a standards
issue than a security issue.
Also, what he'd quoted !# is not the "shebang"
To be honest, none of these methods will actually be effective: root can do
what he/she likes, including monitoring *everything* you do. Worrying about
shell history is not going to solve anything.
Your only choices are to trust root, or setup your own host.
Peter Maxwell
On 6 February 2011
its to determine whether it does what it says on the
tin. You have not done that here.
Regards,
Peter Maxwell
On 12 January 2011 19:08, Tomás Touceda wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I wanted to announce this little pet project that was born a couple of
> weeks ago, and now it see
