You always get these "i'm l33t and like to insult people" kind of goons on unmoderated lists.They're good for a laugh, but usually I just ignore them or if they are particularly odious I filter them to trash. There's still good information to be found every now and again on this list.
On 10/23/06,
FUD= Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.
A marketing trick to scare people into buying your
product/idea/service. Typically vague statements not based on any
known form of reality.
On 10/10/06, darkcube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Pink Hat wrote:
>
> > Prove it or its FUD. You
c0ntex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://noderat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6ADE4614B66EADD2!1321.entry
On 11/09/06, Philosophil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uh. You do realize this was a hoax, right?
>
> On 9/9/06, c0ntex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I know... I was just venting my spleen. I just really hate to
see that kind of thing. How can people learn if they can't ask
questions?
Now if the comment had been along the lines of "Why are you asking
this on Full Disclosure? This is for announcing security alerts.
Perhaps another list
Steven,
You'll have better luck asking the Pen Testing mailing list than this
list. I have seen Full Disclosure go steadily downhill over the last
few months. In fact after this email, I'm unsubscribing from this
useless list.
These days it appears you get nothing but script-kiddies and people
Why is this on the Full Disclosure mailing list? What does this have
to do with Info Sec?
I have to read through a *ton* of mailing lists every day and crap
like this just wastes my time.
On 8/9/06, J.A. Terranson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(This was sent in reponse to a mass email sent out b
Ha!
I had a pretty good laugh at that "attempt". While not as bad as
tubes full of internets, Kos should stick to punditry.
On 8/8/06, kaiser scapegoat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MSNBC has been reporting that the Lieberman campaign site was hacked. There
have been numerous theories on this sin
