Shaqe Wan wrote:
I am not stating that PCI is good in no way, but I am saying that its a
MUST for companies dealing with CC. And in a windows environment, an AV
is important.
He probably thought that I am with the rules of PCI, or that I don't
have any idea that the world is not just
Raj Mathur wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2007 14:27, lostzero wrote:
Is this a sales pitch, or merely a statement.
From someone who can't distinguish between enclosing his/her public key
in a message and signing the message with that public key? Oh come
on...!
-- Raju
Ohwell, signing with
Larry Seltzer wrote:
Phishtank.com resolves to 127.0.0.1, has someone taken it offline?
No, I'm still getting to the site. I don't suppose mcafee.com,
symantec.com and a lot of other security domains also resolve to
127.0.0.1 for you, do they?
I've seen phishtank.com disappear the same way
Morning Wood wrote:
oh wow, fun toys for the holidays...
http://tinyurl.com/9tz5g
postcard.gif.exe
A link to almost this same .exe has been spammed to me several times
some weeks ago. There were a couple of bots in the Undernet-channels,
but nothing really shocking. Suppose they're trying to
Werner Schalk wrote:
Now I exploited it using Aleph One's shellcode (see
http://shellcode.org/shellcode/linux/null-free/) but I won't get a SUID
shell afterwards (I know the exploit did work but I still have my normal
user privleges). Why? I have tried a different shellcode to write a file
or remove the above mentioned config file.
More information about said security update can be found at:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301528
--
Pieter de Boer
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full
