On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:40:51PM +, Harry Metcalfe wrote:
We write and publish light-touch inspections of WordPress plugins
that we do for our clients. They are just a guide - we conduct some
basic checks, not a thorough review.
Would plugins which fail this inspection be of general
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:47:24AM -0700, silence_is_b...@hushmail.com wrote:
I see thank you. My distribution.id nuke did nothingany way to
disable this? It's all about choice after all right ;)
Depends upon the browser. For Firefox, see:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:41:42AM -0700, silence_is_b...@hushmail.com wrote:
Any particular reason when setting duckduckgo as the default search
and searching from the url bar we get an additional nugget of info
sent? Case in point:
GET /?q=add+duckduckgot=canonical HTTP/1.1
[...]
I
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:44:24PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Yes, we have responsibility, but no enough time to make a new release. ...
This failure will never used by real hackers because it's better to found
something in Acrobat or other wildspread soft. ... So stop crying, kiddy.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:09:56PM +0200, Andris Berzins wrote:
$ bash --versionbr /GNU bash, version 4.2.8(1)-release
(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)br /br /$ bash --versionbr /GNU bash,
version 4.0.28(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.8)br /br /Bash fails
to normalize path starting starting with // and
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:43:10AM +, Dan Ballance wrote:
I greatly respect the collective knowledge about security matters on this
list. What do you make of this BBC report? Here in the UK we are seeming
happy to do business with China, but other countries are blocking over
alleged
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:01:06PM -0400, Brian Eaton wrote:
Does cap_setuid give a program enough authority to break out of the
AppArmor profile?
Not directly, no; however, because a process with this capability can
forge credentials over unix domain sockets it is possible that it could
entice
