On 14 September 2013 02:07, Tracy Reed wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:57:55PM PDT, Steve Wray spake thusly:
> > In some cases it could be quite difficult to disengage from
> NSA-influenced
> > projects, eg selinux. So far as I can tell this is pretty much everywhere
> &
I'm wondering how much of the industry/community is going to be in denial.
In some cases it could be quite difficult to disengage from NSA-influenced
projects, eg selinux. So far as I can tell this is pretty much everywhere
now. Redhat embraced it ages ago, its been integrated in the kernel since
I'm not a moderator (OBVIOUSLY) but I'll just leave this here, from the
list charter:
Acceptable Content
Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities is acceptable, for instance
announcement and discussion thereof, exploit techniques and code, related
tools and papers, and other useful informat
James Tucker wrote:
> Please, define right.
>
> Theirs is a world of deception, therefore any judgement you make based
> upon any information may be comprised of as much disinformation as
> information. In effect, you can't define such things for them.
absolutely, and I'm glad someone said it. So
