Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread antisnatchor
retender if you don't have a clue. Cheers antisnatchor Mario Vilas wrote: > I believe Zalewski has explained very well why it isn't a vulnerability, > and you couldn't possibly be calling him hostile. :) > > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:20 AM, M Kirschbaum wrote: >

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-15 Thread antisnatchor
rying to convince us that you're right. Maybe you can create the next LOIC specifically tailored to DoS Youtube with this serious bug, ROFL! Cheers antisnatchor Nicholas Lemonias. wrote: > If you wish to talk seriously about the problem, please send me an email > privately. And we can t

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
> > >> -- Forwarded message -- > >> From: Nicholas Lemonias. <mailto:lem.niko...@googlemail.com>> > >> Date: Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 PM > >> Subject: R

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
as Lemonias.* <mailto:lem.niko...@googlemail.com>> > Date: Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:58 PM > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities > with PoC > To: antisnatchor <mailto:antisnatc...@gmail.com>> > &g

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
LOL you're hopeless. Good luck with your business. Brave customers! Cheers antisnatchor Nicholas Lemonias. wrote: > > People can read the report if they like. Can't you even do basic > things like reading a vulnerability report? > > Can't you see that the advis

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-14 Thread antisnatchor
; that through XHR from years anyways), but simply you wouldn't expect Google to pay you for such a bug. Same with this bug. Cheers antisnatchor > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Jerome Athias wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I concur that we are mainly discussin

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google vulnerabilities with PoC

2014-03-13 Thread antisnatchor
like saying that you have a normal file upload functionality in a PHP application on Apache that expects files with extension .png only, and you manage to upload an .asp file. Security-wise that's not a risk. Cheers antisnatchor Nicholas Lemonias. wrote: > Google vulnerabilities uncove

Re: [Full-disclosure] Results of a XSLT fuzzing effort

2013-03-08 Thread antisnatchor
Nice one Nick, great job eheh :D Cheers antisnatchor Nicolas GrégoireMarch 8, 2013 10:12 AM Hi!I published last week a blog post describing the results of the XSLTfuzzing campaign I did in 2012. Now that most of the discoveredvulnerabilities are patched, I've chosen to give

Re: [Full-disclosure] [0 Day] XSS Persistent in Blogspot of Google

2013-01-29 Thread antisnatchor
x.509 certificates and so on :D Cheers antisnatchor Michal ZalewskiJanuary 27, 2013 7:17 PM OGMMM WTFF 0DAY XSSSorry, getting a bit tired of these.Well, the world is changing. You can probably do a lot more direct damage with a (legit) XSS in a high-value site than with a local priv