Re: [Full-disclosure] vncviewer patched...

2006-05-16 Thread sekure
I generally don't trust your regular, run of the mill religious authority figures, I would be crazy to trust the ones that openly admit that they are evil. On 5/16/06, evilrabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, In case anyone was having trouble patching the vnc client I've supplied a patched

Re: [Full-disclosure] blocking Google Desktop

2006-02-14 Thread sekure
Check out flowbits. The first rule would get flowbits:noalert; flowbits:set,google.user.agent; And the second rule would get flowbits:isset,google.user.agent; That way the alert for the first rule would be suppressed and the second rule would only trigger if the first one occured previously. On

Re: [Full-disclosure] blocking Google Desktop

2006-02-14 Thread sekure
I believe it is per TCP session, but don't quote me on that. Actually now that i think about it, if it indeed is per TCP session then the second rule will not trigger, since the SSL connection will be a part of a different session. I am not 100% sure though. Try it out and let us know. You