As usual you just don't get it. Because you contribute nothing useful, and at the same time seem intent on causing pain to people who do real work. we'd ALL like to punch you in the face, and ALSO break your fingers. Except that you aren't presently worth the trouble.
An unscientific survey was taken at a recent conference where several attendees you abuse were present. Yes, we actually talked about you! Our conclusion: None of us know of a single credible security researcher who has even the time of day for you, not to mention any respect for your abilities or work. The usual trajectory seems to be try to help -> amused tolerance -> pity -> you're dead to me As the entire conference was under Chatham House Rule, I cannot tell you who was there or participated in the discussion. So, like Intercage, can you cite a single person whom you actually work with who would say a good word in public for you? (I doubt it, given that you have few skills and little talent, combined with a concept of "risk" which is contorted by your bizarre paranoid personality, and and excess of persistence which is not enough to overcome all of that insanity.) You are not an original, out-of-the-box thinker, you are an annoying pariah. Only Valdis (whom you regularly abuse) seems to have the patience of a saint in wasting time arguing with you. As you never seem to listen to anyone other than the voices in your head, you don't learn anything from him or anyone else. As you always have to be right, and get the last vindictive word, the community has entirely given up on you, one by one. Many people have suggested you should eat shit and die, or continue drinking yourself to death, a friendless pauper in your sod hut in Scotland still waiting for the black helicopters of some intelligence agency to some day whisk you off to cloud cuckoo land after realizing your great value to them. I think we would be satisfied if you just silently disappeared, and never darkened our inboxes ever again. This is the best service you can do the security community: shut up and disappear. Find something useful to do with your so-called life. All the best, On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:52 AM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Exibar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ROFL!!! hehe, and I wasn't serious when I mentioned that you're not even >> at SANS... Looks like Northcutt called your bluff.... what's next, it >> turns >> out that you're really n3t3d3v too!!!! LOL >> >> > What's SANS stance on joel esler's behaviour towards n3td3v, he still > seems to be writing on the internet storm center diary... looks like > they don't give a fuck about the breach of privacy, the unfunny > aviation security joke on the sans diary podcast, and then to top it > all off, him and his pauldotcom friends having a semi serious > discussion about arranging a fake meet up with n3td3v, so they could > punch me in the face for exposing joel esler's conduct in the first > place. :) > > The SANS name is being smeared all across the mailing lists, due to > joel esler/pauldotcom, yet they still keep him/them associated with > SANS... if they are pissed off about SANS getting a bad name, then get > rid of joel esler/pauldotcom, they seem to be a liability...public > relations wise. > > All the best, > > n3td3v > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
