On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM, mutiny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody making n3td3v stickers that read:
> "Somebody lied to him and Iraq happened."?
>
> I am buying, so long as n3td3v doesn't make them, or receive proceeds
> (of course).
>
> - mutiny
>
lolololol.
Anybody making n3td3v stickers that read:
"Somebody lied to him and Iraq happened."?
I am buying, so long as n3td3v doesn't make them, or receive proceeds
(of course).
- mutiny
n3td3v wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> drink yourself to death. thank
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drink yourself to death. thank you.
>
Bush was an alcoholic as well but that didn't stop him becoming president.
Its just a shame that somebody lied to him and that Iraq happened.
Don't lie to a president based on a false pret
Thank you too.
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 21:41:29 -0400
Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drink yourself to death. thank you.
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:42 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:33 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Putin blames US for Georgi
drink yourself to death. thank you.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:42 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:33 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Putin blames US for Georgia role
>>
>> Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has accused the US of provoking
>> the confli
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:33 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Putin blames US for Georgia role
>
> Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has accused the US of provoking
> the conflict in Georgia, possibly for domestic election purposes.
>
> Mr Putin told CNN US citizens were "in the area" du
Putin blames US for Georgia role
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has accused the US of provoking
the conflict in Georgia, possibly for domestic election purposes.
Mr Putin told CNN US citizens were "in the area" during the conflict
over South Ossetia and were "taking direct orders from thei
That's my whole point.
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 13:35 -0400, Dave wrote:
> Wouldn't their press release indicate that they are actually keeping the
> unit intact? After all, it IS the Office of Disinformation.
>
>
> William McAfee wrote:
> > I have to say, the DoD would be crazy not to ramp up AF
Wouldn't their press release indicate that they are actually keeping the
unit intact? After all, it IS the Office of Disinformation.
William McAfee wrote:
> I have to say, the DoD would be crazy not to ramp up AFCYBER. What
> reason on or off Earth do they have to intentionally not protect
> t
I have to say, the DoD would be crazy not to ramp up AFCYBER. What
reason on or off Earth do they have to intentionally not protect
themselves against attack on the network front? It's crazy to leave
yourself vulnerable like that, much less not have a method of offensive
strike. It's like a coun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Peter Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.afcyber.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123110806
>
> seems the cybercommand is not ramping up..
after demonstrating the many ways they (mis)handle information [0] it
would have been amusing had they been able to contin
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:43:11 EDT, Peter Dawson said:
> seems the cybercommand is not ramping up..
A few years ago, the US Dept of Defense admitted that they had an Office
of Disinformation dedicated to feeding bogus info to our enemies. Of course,
there was a public outrage for some reason. The
http://www.afcyber.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123110806
seems the cybercommand is not ramping up..
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:02 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There's no need as n3td3v got see-throught powa + thight pants
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There's no need as n3td3v got see-throught powa + thight pants
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:23:36 +0200 William McAfee wrote:
>Would you mind elaborating on your actual evidence? All I see is
>logic,
>but I do not see much hard fact. I'm not agreeing, I'
Would you mind elaborating on your actual evidence? All I see is logic,
but I do not see much hard fact. I'm not agreeing, I'm not disagreeing.
I'm just asking for clarification.
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 01:08 +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> By the way, Russian sites have been hacked as well. So why is ever
By the way, Russian sites have been hacked as well. So why is everyone
only talking about the Georgian sites and infrastructure? If Russian
sites and infrastructure is down as well that means the Georgian
government has hacked them, doesn't it Or does it? Or is the whole
thing just a false flag by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- William McAfee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm sorry, I forgot to link the actual website.
>
>http://www.stopgeorgia.ru
>
>On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 17:32 -0400, William McAfee wrote:
>> I would like to point out one of the websites where the Russian
17 matches
Mail list logo
